Norwegian Social Research, Oslo, Norway.
J Health Organ Manag. 2009;23(3):346-58. doi: 10.1108/14777260910966762.
This paper seeks to draw attention to the historical and institutional context of Norwegian home care and to the way in which care agencies have been pressed to reconcile competing demands caused by conflicting policy aims and administrative values. The paper also aims to explore how ideas of contractual management have been interpreted and put into practice in this field of tension.
DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The study draws on policy documents, historical and social research reports, and personal interviews with managers and home care staff from three different case studies representing different eras of management ideas. From this micro perspective the study examines professional work as the intersection between new public management and the health care state.
The findings demonstrate how contractual management is highly influenced by competing drivers of change. Reforms, stressing cost reduction, do not act as a unidirectional reform programme. Instead, they are infused with administrative arguments linked to previous reform ideas aiming to create legitimacy both from "above" and from "below". The dynamic of change often has unintended consequences which in turn prompt further reform efforts.
ORIGINALITY/VALUE: The paper provides insights into the complexity of change following on from New Public Management (NPM). More specifically, change is characterised by tensions originating in competing normative drivers as well as the co-existence of old and new forms of organising.
本文旨在引起人们对挪威家庭护理的历史和制度背景的关注,并探讨护理机构如何在相互冲突的政策目标和行政价值观所导致的竞争需求之间寻求平衡。本文还旨在探讨契约管理理念在这一紧张领域是如何被解释和付诸实践的。
设计/方法/途径:本研究借鉴了政策文件、历史和社会研究报告,以及对来自三个不同案例研究的管理人员和家庭护理人员的个人访谈,这些案例研究代表了不同时期的管理理念。从这个微观视角出发,本研究将专业工作视为新公共管理和医疗保健国家的交叉点。
研究结果表明,契约管理受到相互竞争的变革驱动因素的高度影响。强调降低成本的改革并不是一个单向的改革计划。相反,它们融入了与之前旨在从上至下和从下至上创造合法性的改革理念相关的行政论点。变革的动态往往会产生意想不到的后果,从而促使进一步的改革努力。
原创性/价值:本文深入了解了新公共管理(NPM)之后的变革复杂性。更具体地说,变革的特点是源自相互竞争的规范性驱动因素的紧张关系,以及新旧组织形式的共存。