Suppr超能文献

洛温斯坦职业疗法认知评估在智障人士中的有效性。

Validity of the Loewenstein occupational therapy cognitive assessment in people with intellectual disabilities.

作者信息

Jang Yuh, Chern Jen-suh, Lin Keh-chung

机构信息

School of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Am J Occup Ther. 2009 Jul-Aug;63(4):414-22. doi: 10.5014/ajot.63.4.414.

Abstract

We examined the psychometric properties (internal consistency, concurrent criterion validity, and known-group validity) of the Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment (LOTCA) in people with intellectual disabilities. A total of 111 people with intellectual disabilities and 19 people with no disabilities were included. We used Cronbach's alpha, Spearman's rho, the Kruskal-Wallis test, and one-way analysis of variance for analysis, where appropriate. Results showed good internal consistency on Orientation, Visual Perception, Spatial Perception, Visuomotor Organization, and Thinking Operations subscales (Cronbach's alphas = .82, .74, .76, .86, and .80, respectively), but not on the Motor Praxis subscale (alpha = .48). We found significant correlations between participants' performance on the Pictorial IQ test and disability level and scores on the LOTCA. The known-group validity of the LOTCA in people with intellectual disabilities was satisfactory. We concluded that the LOTCA is a suitable instrument for measuring cognitive abilities and visual perception in people with intellectual disabilities.

摘要

我们检验了洛温斯坦认知作业疗法评定量表(LOTCA)在智障人士中的心理测量学特性(内部一致性、同时效度和已知群体效度)。总共纳入了1成智力障碍者和19名无残疾者。我们在适当情况下使用克朗巴哈系数、斯皮尔曼等级相关系数、克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯检验和单因素方差分析进行分析。结果显示,在定向、视觉感知、空间感知、视运动组织和思维操作分量表上具有良好的内部一致性(克朗巴哈系数分别为0.82、0.74、0.76、0.86和0.80),但在运动运用分量表上并非如此(系数为0.48)。我们发现,参与者在图片智商测试中的表现与残疾程度以及LOTCA得分之间存在显著相关性。LOTCA在智障人士中的已知群体效度令人满意。我们得出结论,LOTCA是测量智障人士认知能力和视觉感知的合适工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验