Tucker Kylie, Butler Jane, Graven-Nielsen Thomas, Riek Stephan, Hodges Paul
School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4029, Australia.
J Neurosci. 2009 Sep 2;29(35):10820-6. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5211-08.2009.
Muscle pain is associated with decreased motor unit discharge rate during constant force contractions. As discharge rate is a determinant of force, other adaptations in strategy must explain force maintenance during pain. Our aim was to determine whether motor unit recruitment strategies are altered during pain to maintain force despite reduced discharge rate. Motor unit discharge behavior was recorded in two muscles, one with (quadriceps) and one without [flexor pollicis longus (FPL)] synergists. Motor units were recruited during matched low-force contractions with and without experimentally induced pain, and at higher force without pain. A total of 52 and 34 units were recorded in quadriceps and FPL, respectively, during low-force contractions with and without pain. Of these, 20 quadriceps and 9 FPL units were identified during both trials. The discharge rate of these units reduced during pain in both muscles [quadriceps: 8.7 (1.5) to 7.5 (1.3) Hz, p < 0.001; FPL: 11.9 (1.5) to 10.0 (1.7) Hz, p < 0.001]. All remaining units discharged only with or without pain, but not in both conditions. Only one-third of the additional units recruited during pain (quadriceps n = 7/19, FPL n = 3/15) were those expected given orderly recruitment of the motor unit pool as determined during higher-force contractions. We conclude that reduced motor unit discharge rate with pain is accompanied by changes in the population of units used to maintain force. The recruitment of new units is partly inconsistent with generalized inhibition of the motoneuron pool predicted by the "pain adaptation" theory, and provides the basis for a new mechanism of motor adaptation with pain.
肌肉疼痛与持续用力收缩期间运动单位放电率降低有关。由于放电率是力量的一个决定因素,那么策略上的其他适应性变化必定可以解释疼痛期间力量的维持。我们的目的是确定在疼痛期间运动单位募集策略是否发生改变,以便在放电率降低的情况下维持力量。在两块肌肉中记录运动单位的放电行为,一块肌肉有协同肌(股四头肌),另一块没有协同肌[拇长屈肌(FPL)]。在匹配的低强度收缩过程中,分别在有和没有实验性诱导疼痛的情况下募集运动单位,以及在没有疼痛的更高强度收缩时募集运动单位。在有和没有疼痛的低强度收缩过程中,分别在股四头肌和FPL中记录到总共52个和34个运动单位。其中,在两次试验中都识别出20个股四头肌运动单位和9个FPL运动单位。在两块肌肉中,这些运动单位在疼痛期间的放电率均降低[股四头肌:8.7(1.5)至7.5(1.3)Hz,p<0.001;FPL:11.9(1.5)至10.0(1.7)Hz,p<0.001]。所有其余的运动单位仅在有或没有疼痛时放电,但并非在两种情况下都放电。在疼痛期间额外募集的运动单位中,只有三分之一(股四头肌n = 7/19,FPL n = 3/15)是在更高强度收缩期间确定的运动单位池有序募集情况下预期会出现的。我们得出结论,疼痛导致运动单位放电率降低的同时,用于维持力量的运动单位群体也会发生变化。新运动单位的募集部分不符合“疼痛适应”理论所预测的运动神经元池的普遍抑制,并且为疼痛时运动适应的新机制提供了基础。