Alcohol Research Group, 6475 Christie Avenue, Emeryville, CA 94608, USA.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2009 Dec;33(12):2057-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2009.01045.x. Epub 2009 Sep 9.
There is inadequate recognition of alcohol misuse as a public health issue in India. Information on screening measures is critical for prevention and early intervention efforts. This study critically evaluated the full and shorter versions of the AUDIT and RAPS4-QF as screening measures for alcohol use disorders (AUDs) in a community sample of male drinkers in Goa, India.
Data from male drinking respondents in a population study on alcohol use patterns and sexual risk behaviors in randomly selected rural and urban areas of North Goa are reported. Overall, 39% (n = 743) of the 1899 screened men, age 18 to 49, reported consuming alcohol in the last 12 months. These current drinkers were administered the screening measures as part of detailed interviews on drinking patterns and AUD symptoms. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted for each combination of screening measure and criterion (alcohol dependence or any AUD). Reliability and correlations among the 4 measures were also examined.
All 4 measures performed well with area under the curves of at least 0.79. The full screeners that included both drinking patterns and problem items (the AUDIT and the RAP4-QF) performed better than their shorter versions (the AUDIT-C and the RAPS4) in detecting AUDs. Performance of the AUDIT and RAPS4-QF improved with lowered and raised thresholds, respectively, and alternate cut-off scores are suggested. Scores on the full measures were significantly correlated (0.80). Reliability estimates for the AUDIT measures were higher than those for the RAPS4 measures.
All measures were efficient at detecting AUDs. When screening for alcohol-related problems among males in the general population in India, cut-off scores for screeners may need to be adjusted. Selecting an appropriate screening measure and cut-off score necessitates careful consideration of the screening context and resources available to confirm alcohol-related diagnoses.
在印度,人们对酗酒问题的认识还远远不够,没有将其视为一个公共卫生问题。有关筛选措施的信息对于预防和早期干预工作至关重要。本研究对 AUDIT 和 RAPS4-QF 的完整版本和简化版本进行了严格评估,以确定它们在印度果阿邦男性饮酒者的社区样本中作为酒精使用障碍(AUD)筛查措施的适用性。
本研究的数据来自于一项关于酒精使用模式和性风险行为的人群研究,该研究在北果阿随机选择的农村和城市地区对男性饮酒者进行了筛查。在总共 1899 名接受筛查的 18 至 49 岁男性中,有 39%(n=743)的人在过去 12 个月内饮酒。这些当前饮酒者接受了筛查措施,作为饮酒模式和 AUD 症状详细访谈的一部分。对每种筛查措施与标准(酒精依赖或任何 AUD)的组合进行了接收者操作特征(ROC)分析。还检查了这 4 种措施之间的可靠性和相关性。
所有 4 种措施的曲线下面积均至少为 0.79,表现良好。包含饮酒模式和问题项目的完整筛查工具(AUDIT 和 RAP4-QF)比其简化版本(AUDIT-C 和 RAPS4)在检测 AUD 方面表现更好。AUDIT 和 RAPS4-QF 的性能随着阈值的降低和升高而提高,建议使用不同的截断分数。完整措施的分数显著相关(0.80)。AUDIT 措施的可靠性估计值高于 RAPS4 措施。
所有措施在检测 AUD 方面都很有效。在印度普通人群中筛查男性的酒精相关问题时,筛查工具的截断分数可能需要进行调整。选择合适的筛查工具和截断分数需要仔细考虑筛查背景和可用资源,以确认与酒精相关的诊断。