Carlisle Sandra, Henderson Gregor, Hanlon Phil W
Public Health & Health Policy Section, University of Glasgow, UK.
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Nov;69(10):1556-60. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.08.029. Epub 2009 Sep 16.
In the now vast empirical and theoretical literature on wellbeing knowledge of the subject is provided mainly by psychology and economics, where understanding of the concept are framed in very different ways. We briefly rehearse these, before turning to some important critical points which can be made about this burgeoning research industry, including the tight connections between the meanings of the concept with the moral value systems of particular 'modern' societies. We then argue that both the 'science' of wellbeing and its critique are, despite their diversity, re-connected by and subsumed within the emerging environmental critique of modern consumer society. This places concerns for individual and social wellbeing within the broader context of global human problems and planetary wellbeing. A growing number of thinkers now suggest that Western society and culture are dominated by materialistic and individualistic values, made manifest at the political and social levels through the unending pursuit of economic growth, and at the individual level by the seemingly endless quest for consumer goods, regardless of global implications such as broader environmental harms. The escalating growth of such values is associated with a growing sense of individual alienation, social fragmentation and civic disengagement and with the decline of more spiritual, moral and ethical aspects of life. Taken together, these multiple discourses suggest that wellbeing can be understood as a collateral casualty of the economic, social and cultural changes associated with late modernity. However, increasing concerns for the environment have the potential to counter some of these trends, and in so doing could also contribute to our wellbeing as individuals and as social beings in a finite world.
在如今大量关于幸福的实证和理论文献中,对该主题的认识主要由心理学和经济学提供,而在这两个学科中,对幸福概念的理解框架截然不同。在转向关于这个蓬勃发展的研究领域的一些重要关键点之前,我们先简要回顾一下这些框架,其中包括幸福概念的含义与特定“现代”社会的道德价值体系之间的紧密联系。然后我们认为,幸福科学及其批判,尽管存在多样性,但都通过对现代消费社会新兴的环境批判重新联系起来,并被纳入其中。这将对个人和社会幸福的关注置于全球人类问题和地球福祉的更广泛背景之下。现在越来越多的思想家认为,西方社会和文化受物质主义和个人主义价值观主导,在政治和社会层面表现为对经济增长的无休止追求,在个人层面则表现为对消费品的看似无止境的追求,而不顾及更广泛的环境危害等全球影响。这些价值观的不断升级与个人疏离感、社会碎片化和公民参与度下降以及生活中更精神、道德和伦理层面的衰落相关。综合来看,这些多元论述表明,幸福可被理解为与晚期现代性相关的经济、社会和文化变革的附带牺牲品。然而,对环境的日益关注有可能扭转其中一些趋势,并且这样做也可能有助于我们作为有限世界中的个体和社会成员的幸福。