Gagnon Robert
Montreal QC.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2009 Aug;31(8):748-753. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34282-7.
To describe the etiology of vasa previa and the risk factors and associated condition, to identify the various clinical presentations of vasa previa, to describe the ultrasound tools used in its diagnosis, and to describe the management of vasa previa.
Reduction of perinatal mortality, short-term neonatal morbidity, long-term infant morbidity, and short-term and long-term maternal morbidity and mortality.
Published literature on randomized trials, prospective cohort studies, and selected retrospective cohort studies was retrieved through searches of PubMed or Medline, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library, using appropriate controlled vocabulary (e.g., selected epidemiological studies comparing delivery by Caesarean section with vaginal delivery; studies comparing outcomes when vasa previa is diagnosed antenatally vs. intrapartum) and key words (e.g., vasa previa). Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized control trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational studies. Searches were updated on a regular basis and incorporated into the guideline to October 1, 2008. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment and health technology assessment-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and from national and international medical specialty societies.
The evidence collected was reviewed by the Diagnostic Imaging Committee and the Maternal Fetal Medicine Committee of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC) and quantified using the evaluation of evidence guidelines developed by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.
BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: The benefit expected from this guideline is facilitation of optimal and uniform care for pregnancies complicated by vasa previa.
The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada.
A comparison of women who were diagnosed antenatally and those who were not shows respective neonatal survival rates of 97% and 44%, and neonatal blood transfusion rates of 3.4% and 58.5%, respectively. Vasa previa can be diagnosed antenatally, using combined abdominal and transvaginal ultrasound and colour flow mapping; however, many cases are not diagnosed, and not making such a diagnosis is still acceptable. Even under the best circumstances the false positive rate is extremely low. (II-2).
描述前置血管的病因、危险因素及相关情况,识别前置血管的各种临床表现,描述用于其诊断的超声检查方法,并阐述前置血管的处理措施。
降低围产期死亡率、短期新生儿发病率、长期婴儿发病率以及短期和长期孕产妇发病率及死亡率。
通过检索PubMed或Medline、CINAHL以及Cochrane图书馆,使用适当的控制词汇(如比较剖宫产与阴道分娩的选定流行病学研究;比较产前与产时诊断前置血管时的结局的研究)和关键词(如前置血管),检索已发表的关于随机试验、前瞻性队列研究以及选定的回顾性队列研究的文献。结果仅限于系统评价、随机对照试验/对照临床试验以及观察性研究。检索定期更新,并纳入截至2008年10月1日的指南。通过搜索卫生技术评估及与卫生技术评估相关机构的网站、临床实践指南汇编、临床试验注册库以及国家和国际医学专业协会,识别灰色(未发表)文献。
收集到的证据由加拿大妇产科医师协会(SOGC)的诊断成像委员会和母胎医学委员会进行审查,并根据加拿大预防保健工作组制定的证据评估指南进行量化。
益处、危害和成本:本指南预期的益处是为前置血管合并妊娠提供优化和统一的护理。
加拿大妇产科医师协会。
产前诊断和未产前诊断的女性相比,新生儿存活率分别为97%和44%,新生儿输血率分别为3.4%和58.5%。前置血管可通过腹部和经阴道联合超声及彩色血流图进行产前诊断;然而,许多病例未被诊断出来,未做出此类诊断仍然是可以接受的。即使在最佳情况下,假阳性率也极低。(II - 2)