Chu Byoung Sun, Wood Joanne M, Collins Michael J
School of Optometry and Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Optom Vis Sci. 2009 Nov;86(11):E1267-75. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181bb41fa.
To investigate whether wearing different presbyopic vision corrections alters the pattern of eye and head movements when viewing and responding to driving-related traffic scenes.
Participants included 20 presbyopes (mean age: 56.1 +/- 5.7 years) who had no experience of wearing presbyopic vision corrections, apart from single vision (SV) reading spectacles. Each participant wore five different vision corrections: distance SV lenses, progressive addition spectacle lenses (PAL), bifocal spectacle lenses (BIF), monovision (MV) and multifocal contact lenses (MTF CL). For each visual condition, participants were required to view videotape recordings of traffic scenes, track a reference vehicle, and identify a series of peripherally presented targets. Digital numerical display panels were also included as near visual stimuli (simulating the visual displays of a vehicle speedometer and radio). Eye and head movements were measured, and the accuracy of target recognition was also recorded.
The path length of eye movements while viewing and responding to driving-related traffic scenes was significantly longer when wearing BIF and PAL than MV and MTF CL (both p < or = 0.013). The path length of head movements was greater with SV, BIF, and PAL than MV and MTF CL (all p < 0.001). Target recognition and brake response times were not significantly affected by vision correction, whereas target recognition was less accurate when the near stimulus was located at eccentricities inferiorly and to the left, rather than directly below the primary position of gaze (p = 0.008), regardless of vision correction.
Different presbyopic vision corrections alter eye and head movement patterns. The longer path length of eye and head movements and greater number of saccades associated with the spectacle presbyopic corrections may affect some aspects of driving performance.
研究佩戴不同的老视视力矫正眼镜在观看与驾驶相关的交通场景并做出反应时,是否会改变眼睛和头部的运动模式。
研究对象为20名老视患者(平均年龄:56.1±5.7岁),除单焦点(SV)阅读眼镜外,他们没有佩戴老视视力矫正眼镜的经历。每位参与者佩戴五种不同的视力矫正眼镜:远用SV镜片、渐进多焦点眼镜片(PAL)、双焦点眼镜片(BIF)、单眼视(MV)和多焦点隐形眼镜(MTF CL)。对于每种视觉条件,要求参与者观看交通场景的录像带,跟踪一辆参考车辆,并识别一系列周边呈现的目标。还包括数字数字显示面板作为近视觉刺激(模拟车辆速度计和收音机的视觉显示)。测量眼睛和头部的运动,并记录目标识别的准确性。
佩戴BIF和PAL时,在观看与驾驶相关的交通场景并做出反应时,眼睛运动的路径长度明显长于MV和MTF CL(p均≤0.013)。佩戴SV、BIF和PAL时头部运动的路径长度大于MV和MTF CL(p均<0.001)。目标识别和刹车反应时间不受视力矫正的显著影响,而无论视力矫正如何,当近刺激位于下方和左侧偏心位置而非直接在注视中心下方时,目标识别的准确性较低(p = 0.008)。
不同的老视视力矫正会改变眼睛和头部的运动模式。与眼镜老视矫正相关的眼睛和头部运动路径长度较长以及扫视次数较多可能会影响驾驶性能的某些方面。