Clinic for Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, Unit of Periodontology, School for Dental Medicine, Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, Germany.
Clin Oral Investig. 2010 Dec;14(6):637-44. doi: 10.1007/s00784-009-0347-4. Epub 2009 Oct 13.
The aim of this study was to compare the short-term performance of a session of single photodynamic therapy (PDT) and of a conventional ultrasonic debridement (UST) in persistent pockets of maintenance patients. In a prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind clinical study, patients with chronic periodontitis with at least two persistent pockets (>4 mm) were enrolled. They were treated either with UST (n = 29) or PDT (n = 25). Clinical and microbiological examinations were performed at baseline and after 3 months. For UST, the mean probing depth was reduced from 5.3 to 4.5 mm (p = <0.001) and for PDT from 5.3 to 4.7 mm (p < 0.001) with no difference between the two treatment modalities. Microbial counts were significantly reduced about 30% to 40% immediately after debridement but returned to baseline values a 3 months irrespective of treatment. PDT is not superior to conventional mechanical treatment of persistent pockets, but it may be a meaningful therapeutic alternative; the clinical effects were too minor to draw a definitive conclusion.
本研究旨在比较单次光动力疗法(PDT)和传统超声清创术(UST)在维持治疗患者持续性牙周袋中的短期疗效。采用前瞻性、随机、对照、单盲临床研究,纳入至少有两个持续性牙周袋(>4 毫米)的慢性牙周炎患者。他们分别接受 UST(n=29)或 PDT(n=25)治疗。基线和 3 个月时进行临床和微生物学检查。UST 组的平均探诊深度从 5.3 毫米降至 4.5 毫米(p<0.001),PDT 组从 5.3 毫米降至 4.7 毫米(p<0.001),两种治疗方式之间无差异。清创后微生物计数立即降低约 30%至 40%,但无论治疗方式如何,3 个月时均恢复至基线值。PDT 并不优于传统的机械性治疗持续性牙周袋,但它可能是一种有意义的治疗选择;临床效果太小,无法得出明确结论。