Neurodegenerative Disease Research Centre, School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, King's College, London, UK.
Exp Neurol. 2010 Jan;221(1):79-85. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.10.004. Epub 2009 Oct 13.
We previously showed that continuous infusion of rotigotine resulted in less dyskinesia than repeated pulsatile rotigotine administration or repeated oral administration of L-DOPA in MPTP-treated marmosets. Now we investigate whether continuous rotigotine delivery modifies established dyskinesia induced by prior exposure to repeated pulsatile administration of L-DOPA or rotigotine in MPTP-treated common marmosets. Repeated oral administration of L-DOPA or subcutaneous bolus administration of rotigotine over 28 days improved motor deficits but resulted in the onset of dyskinesia of moderate intensity. When these animals were switched to a 28-day continuous infusion of rotigotine, the reversal of motor disability was maintained. In those animals initially treated with L-DOPA, there was a small reduction in dyskinesia intensity but a significant reduction in the duration of dyskinesia. However, in animals initially treated with repeated bolus administration of rotigotine, dyskinesia intensity was significantly reduced. Initial treatment with a continuous infusion of rotigotine for 28 days reversed motor disability and resulted in a low incidence of dyskinesia. On switching to repeated oral administration of L-DOPA, the improvement in motor disability was maintained but the propensity of L-DOPA to provoke dyskinesia was not affected. In addition, while the continuous delivery of rotigotine prevented the expression of dyskinesia, the previously demonstrated ability of dopamine agonists to prime for dyskinesia could not be avoided. These data suggest that dyskinesia induced by pulsatile drug treatment may be improved by switching to continuous rotigotine delivery. In addition, while continuous delivery of rotigotine may prime for dyskinesia, it does not lead to its expression.
我们之前曾表明,与重复脉冲式给予罗替高汀或重复给予 MPTP 处理的食蟹猴口服 L-DOPA 相比,持续输注罗替高汀导致运动障碍的发生率更低。现在,我们研究了连续给予罗替高汀是否会改变先前经重复脉冲式给予 L-DOPA 或罗替高汀处理后引起的运动障碍。在 28 天内重复给予 L-DOPA 口服或皮下给予罗替高汀可改善运动障碍,但会导致中度强度的运动障碍发作。当这些动物切换到 28 天的罗替高汀持续输注时,运动障碍的逆转得以维持。在那些最初用 L-DOPA 治疗的动物中,运动障碍的强度略有降低,但运动障碍的持续时间明显减少。然而,在最初接受重复给予罗替高汀的动物中,运动障碍的强度显著降低。最初连续输注罗替高汀 28 天可逆转运动障碍并导致运动障碍发生率较低。切换至重复口服给予 L-DOPA 后,运动障碍的改善得以维持,但 L-DOPA 引发运动障碍的倾向并未受到影响。此外,虽然持续给予罗替高汀可防止运动障碍的表达,但先前证明的多巴胺激动剂引起运动障碍的能力是无法避免的。这些数据表明,通过切换至连续罗替高汀输注可改善脉冲式药物治疗引起的运动障碍。此外,虽然连续给予罗替高汀可能会引发运动障碍,但不会导致其表达。