Bonnefon Jean-François
Cognition, Langues, Langage et Ergonomie (CLLE), Centre national de la recherche scientifique, Paris, France.
Psychol Rev. 2009 Oct;116(4):888-907. doi: 10.1037/a0017186.
Many "if p, then q" conditionals have decision-theoretic features, such as antecedents or consequents that relate to the utility functions of various agents. These decision-theoretic features leak into reasoning processes, resulting in various paralogical conclusions. The theory of utility conditionals offers a unified account of the various forms that this phenomenon can take. The theory is built on 2 main components: (1) a representational tool (the utility grid), which summarizes in compact form the decision-theoretic features of a conditional, and (2) a set of folk axioms of decision, which reflect reasoners' beliefs about the way most agents make their decisions. Applying the folk axioms to the utility grid of a conditional allows for the systematic prediction of the paralogical conclusions invited by the utility grid's decision-theoretic features. The theory of utility conditionals significantly extends the scope of current theories of conditional inference and moves reasoning research toward a greater integration with decision-making research.
许多“如果p,那么q”条件句具有决策理论特征,比如与各种主体的效用函数相关的前件或后件。这些决策理论特征渗透到推理过程中,导致各种似非而是的结论。效用条件句理论为这一现象可能呈现的各种形式提供了统一的解释。该理论基于两个主要部分构建:(1)一种表征工具(效用网格),它以紧凑的形式总结了一个条件句的决策理论特征;(2)一组民间决策公理,它们反映了推理者对大多数主体做决策方式的信念。将民间公理应用于一个条件句的效用网格,就能系统地预测由效用网格的决策理论特征引发的似非而是的结论。效用条件句理论显著扩展了当前条件推理理论的范围,并推动推理研究朝着与决策研究更大程度的整合发展。