Suppr超能文献

单侧椎旁阻滞:一种替代传统椎管内麻醉的方法,用于治疗腹股沟疝修补术。

Unilateral paravertebral block: an alternative to conventional spinal anaesthesia for inguinal hernia repair.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, North Bengal Medical College, Darjeeling, West Bengal, India.

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010 Feb;54(2):246-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2009.02128.x. Epub 2009 Oct 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Inguinal herniorrhaphy can be successfully performed using general, regional or local anaesthesia. Paravertebral block (PVB) has been used for unilateral procedures such as thoracotomy, breast surgery, chest wall trauma, hernia repair or renal surgery.

METHODS

We compared unilateral lumbar PVB with conventional spinal anaesthesia (SA) in 60 consenting ASA I and II males aged 18-65 years, scheduled for unilateral inguinal hernia repair. Patients were randomly assigned into two groups, P (n=30) or S (n=30) to receive either PVB or SA, respectively. Two patients (7%) in group P had to be converted to general anaesthesia due to block failure. During surgery, patients of both groups received intravenous infusion of propofol titrated to light sedation.

RESULTS

The time to first post-operative analgesic requirement (primary outcome measure) as 342 +/- 73 min in group P and 222 +/- 22 min in group S (P<0.0001). Time to ambulation was 234 +/- 111 min in group P and 361 +/- 32 min in group S (P<0.0001). Urinary retention requiring catheterization were found in zero (0%) patients in group P compared with five (16%) in group S (P=0.024).

CONCLUSION

It can be concluded that unilateral PVB is more efficacious than conventional SA in terms of prolonging post-operative analgesia and reducing morbidities in patients undergoing elective unilateral inguinal hernia repair.

摘要

背景

腹股沟疝修补术可以在全身麻醉、区域麻醉或局部麻醉下成功进行。椎旁阻滞(PVB)已被用于单侧手术,如开胸术、乳房手术、胸壁创伤、疝修补术或肾手术。

方法

我们比较了 60 名 ASA I 和 II 级男性患者(年龄 18-65 岁)接受单侧腰 PVB 与传统脊髓麻醉(SA)的情况,这些患者均计划接受单侧腹股沟疝修补术。患者随机分为两组,P 组(n=30)或 S 组(n=30),分别接受 PVB 或 SA。由于阻滞失败,P 组中有 2 名患者(7%)不得不转为全身麻醉。在手术过程中,两组患者均接受丙泊酚静脉输注,以达到轻度镇静的效果。

结果

P 组首次术后需要镇痛的时间(主要观察指标)为 342+/-73 分钟,S 组为 222+/-22 分钟(P<0.0001)。P 组下床时间为 234+/-111 分钟,S 组为 361+/-32 分钟(P<0.0001)。P 组中 0%(0 名)患者需要导尿治疗尿潴留,而 S 组中 16%(5 名)患者需要导尿治疗尿潴留(P=0.024)。

结论

可以得出结论,与传统 SA 相比,单侧 PVB 在延长术后镇痛时间和减少接受选择性单侧腹股沟疝修补术的患者的发病率方面更为有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验