Medical Clinic of Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University, New York.
J Exp Med. 1926 Sep 30;44(4):439-46. doi: 10.1084/jem.44.4.439.
The interpretation of the results in these experiments is difficult on account of the variations in the physical capacity of different strains of hemolytic streptococcus to agglutinate and absorb agglutinin. Even when the antigens for agglutination and absorption are standardized and sera are carefully titrated variations in agglutination occur with different strains and sera. Variations may occur because of differences in the titer of the immune sera employed. In a large series of reactions with the same sera and strains, errors in interpretation depending on these factors can be eliminated because strains which agglutinate poorly will consistently give weak reaction with all sera, and weak sera will agglutinate all strains poorly. after such variations See PDF for Structure in agglutination are eliminated, if a strain varies grossly in agglutination with different sera, or the titer of different sera varies with the same strain as in Tables I to III, variations which occur must represent antigenic dissimilarities. We have previously commented on the dissimilarity of the individual strains in the scarlatinal and erysipelas groups. Although the strains within each of the groups are related they are seldom identical. This individuality of the strain was indicated by the fact that absorption by heterologous strains failed to absorb the agglutinin for the strain homologous with the serum. This strain individuality is again apparent in Tables I to III. Doses of heterologous strains equivalent to the unit absorptive dose which has already been defined, fail to remove the agglutinin for the homologous strain. This dose is sufficient however, to absorb the agglutinin for practically all heterologous strains. It appears from this observation that the strain specificity dominates the group specificity. Between the unit absorptive dose and a dose which is approximately 0.2 to 0.3 of this unit, is a zone of great variation in absorption and agglutination. Below this zone absorption is complete for few strains. The differences in titer of various strains and absorbed sera in the zone where variations occur are very definite. For example in Table II, Strain E IX agglutinates well in Serum II absorbed with Strains E I and E III but poorly in serum absorbed with Strain E II. Numerous similar examples may be found. In a few instances heterologous strains agglutinate nearly as well as the homologous strains in these absorbed sera. Such strains probably resemble the homologous strains closely. These resemblances are not confined to the erysipelas strains but occur among the scarlet strains which agglutinate in erysipelas sera. Apparently it is impo-ssible to distinguish such scarlatinal strains from erysipelas strains by absorption of agglutinin. The relationship shown by these absorption tests is additional evidence in favor of the mosaic nature of the antigen. Strains of streptococcus of the erysipelas groups are apparently composed of several agglutinogenic fractions. If the antigen of a strain is made up of the fractions A, B, C, D, and E, serum for that strain would contain A, B, C, D, and E agglutinins. If this serum were absorbed with the homologous strain or an identical heterologous strain the agglutinin would be completely absorbed. On the other hand a qualitative or quantitative difference between the two strains would be apparent in the absorption and agglutination reactions. Such differences are evident in Tables I to III. This serum would agglutinate any strain containing any one or several of the fractions, but absorption of the serum by such a strain would leave fractions of the agglutinin in the serum. This absorbed serum would agglutinate the homologous strain. Heterologous strains would agglutinate if fractions remained in the serum corresponding to their antigenic components. Hence the reactions in the absorbed serum would depend on the qualitative and quantitative relationships between the component fractions in the serum, the absorbing strain, and the strains agglutinated. This conception of multiple antigens is not new in bacteriology. Durham (3) explained the reactions in the colon-typhoid group of bacilli on this basis. More recently Durand and Sedallian (4), and Andrewes, Derick, and Swift (5) have expressed the opinion that the agglutination reactions with hemolytic streptococcus can only be accounted for in this way. In many respects the reactions observed with the colon-typhoid group of Gram-negative bacilli resemble those experienced with the erysipelas and scarlatinal groups of hemolytic streptococcus. Apparently we have exhausted the possibilities of studying these groups further by agglutination and absorption. Our knowledge regarding the specificity and relationship of the antigenic fractions must come from the study of fractions isolated and refined by chemical methods.
这些实验结果的解释很困难,因为不同溶血性链球菌菌株在凝集和吸收凝集素方面的物理能力存在差异。即使用于凝集和吸收的抗原标准化,并且血清仔细滴定,不同菌株和血清之间仍会发生凝集变化。差异可能是由于免疫血清的效价不同造成的。在与相同血清和菌株的大量反应中,由于这些因素导致的解释错误可以消除,因为凝集不良的菌株将始终与所有血清产生弱反应,而弱血清将与所有菌株凝集不良。在消除这些凝集变化之后,如果一个菌株与不同血清的凝集差异很大,或者不同血清与同一菌株的效价变化如表格 I 至 III 所示,那么发生的变化必须代表抗原的不同。我们之前已经评论了猩红热和丹毒组中个别菌株的不同。尽管组内的菌株是相关的,但它们很少是相同的。这种菌株的个体性表现在异源菌株的吸收未能吸收与血清同源的菌株的凝集素。在表格 I 至 III 中再次明显看出这种菌株的个体性。与已经定义的单位吸收剂量相当的异源菌株剂量不足以去除同源菌株的凝集素。然而,这个剂量足以吸收几乎所有异源菌株的凝集素。从这个观察结果可以看出,菌株特异性主导了组特异性。在单位吸收剂量和大约为该单位的 0.2 到 0.3 的剂量之间,是吸收和凝集变化非常大的区域。在这个区域以下,很少有菌株能够完全吸收。在发生变化的区域,各种菌株和吸收血清的效价差异非常明显。例如,在表格 II 中,菌株 EIX 在与菌株 E I 和 E III 吸收的血清 II 中凝集良好,但在与菌株 E II 吸收的血清中凝集不良。可以找到许多类似的例子。在少数情况下,异源菌株在这些吸收的血清中的凝集程度几乎与同源菌株一样好。这些菌株可能与同源菌株非常相似。这些相似之处不仅限于丹毒菌株,而且发生在在猩红热血清中凝集的猩红热菌株中。显然,通过吸收凝集素不可能将这些猩红热菌株与丹毒菌株区分开来。这些吸收测试显示的关系是支持抗原镶嵌性质的额外证据。丹毒组链球菌菌株显然由几个凝集原性部分组成。如果一个菌株的抗原由 A、B、C、D 和 E 部分组成,那么该菌株的血清将含有 A、B、C、D 和 E 凝集素。如果该血清与同源菌株或相同的异源菌株吸收,那么凝集素将被完全吸收。另一方面,两个菌株之间的定性或定量差异将在吸收和凝集反应中显现出来。在表格 I 至 III 中可以明显看出这些差异。这种血清将凝集任何含有任何一个或几个部分的菌株,但该血清被这种菌株吸收后,血清中的部分凝集素将保留下来。这种吸收后的血清将与同源菌株凝集。异源菌株如果血清中仍存在与其抗原成分相对应的部分,则会凝集。因此,吸收后的血清中的反应将取决于血清中组分的定性和定量关系、吸收的菌株和凝集的菌株。这种多抗原的概念在细菌学中并不是新的。Durham(3)基于此解释了结肠伤寒组杆菌的反应。最近,Durand 和 Sedallian(4)以及 Andrewes、Derick 和 Swift(5)认为,只有通过这种方式才能解释与溶血性链球菌的凝集反应。在许多方面,与革兰氏阴性杆菌的结肠伤寒组的反应与溶血性链球菌的丹毒和猩红热组的反应相似。显然,我们已经通过凝集和吸收进一步研究这些组的可能性已经耗尽。我们关于抗原性部分的特异性和关系的知识必须来自化学方法分离和精制的部分的研究。