de Vries Mirjam K, van Eijk Izhar C, van der Horst-Bruinsma Irene E, Peters Mike J L, Nurmohamed Michael T, Dijkmans Ben A C, Hazenberg Bouke P C, Wolbink Gerrit J
VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Nov 15;61(11):1484-90. doi: 10.1002/art.24838.
To study the usefulness of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and serum amyloid A (SAA) for response prediction and monitoring of anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) treatment in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients.
Patients were included consecutively before starting etanercept or infliximab treatment. ASsessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) response, defined as a 50% improvement or an absolute improvement of 2 points of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI; 0-10 scale), was assessed at 3 months. Inflammatory markers and the BASDAI were collected at baseline and 1 and 3 months. Longitudinal data analysis was performed to compare associations between inflammatory markers and the BASDAI over time by calculating standardized betas. Predictive values of baseline levels of inflammatory markers for ASAS response were calculated.
In total, 155 patients were included, of whom, after 3 months of treatment, 70% in the etanercept cohort and 71% in the infliximab cohort responded. All markers, notably SAA, decreased significantly (P < 0.0001). Standardized betas were 0.49 for ESR, 0.43 for CRP, and 0.39 for SAA. Normal baseline levels of CRP and SAA were significantly associated with nonresponse. A combination of elevated CRP and SAA levels at baseline revealed the highest predictive value (81%) for ASAS response.
ESR, CRP, and SAA were significantly associated with the BASDAI over 3 months, and the association with ESR was the strongest. Elevated baseline CRP and SAA levels revealed the highest predictive value for response. Together, this study demonstrates that inflammatory markers, and notably CRP and SAA, may facilitate patient selection and monitoring of efficacy of anti-TNF treatment in AS, and could be added to response criteria.
研究红细胞沉降率(ESR)、C反应蛋白(CRP)和血清淀粉样蛋白A(SAA)在强直性脊柱炎(AS)患者中对抗肿瘤坏死因子(抗TNF)治疗反应预测及监测的作用。
在开始使用依那西普或英夫利昔单抗治疗前连续纳入患者。在3个月时评估强直性脊柱炎评估(ASAS)反应,定义为巴斯强直性脊柱炎疾病活动指数(BASDAI;0 - 10分制)改善50%或绝对改善2分。在基线、1个月和3个月时收集炎症标志物和BASDAI。通过计算标准化β系数进行纵向数据分析,以比较炎症标志物与BASDAI随时间的关联。计算炎症标志物基线水平对ASAS反应的预测值。
共纳入155例患者,其中治疗3个月后,依那西普队列中70%的患者有反应,英夫利昔单抗队列中71%的患者有反应。所有标志物,尤其是SAA,显著下降(P < 0.0001)。ESR的标准化β系数为0.49,CRP为0.43,SAA为0.39。CRP和SAA的基线正常水平与无反应显著相关。基线时CRP和SAA水平升高的组合对ASAS反应显示出最高的预测价值(81%)。
ESR、CRP和SAA在3个月内与BASDAI显著相关,且与ESR的关联最强。基线CRP和SAA水平升高对反应显示出最高的预测价值。总之,本研究表明炎症标志物,尤其是CRP和SAA,可能有助于AS患者的选择及抗TNF治疗疗效的监测,并可纳入反应标准。