Suppr超能文献

使用录像访谈评估汉密尔顿抑郁量表的组内信度——重点关注评估者设盲。

Inter-rater reliability of Hamilton depression rating scale using video- recorded interviews - Focus on rater-blinding.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bangalore - 560029, India.

出版信息

Indian J Psychiatry. 2009 Jul-Sep;51(3):191-4. doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.55085.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hamilton depression rating scale (Ham-D) is the most widely used clinician rating scale for depression. There has been no Indian study that has examined the inter-rater reliability (IRR) of video-recorded interviews of the 21-item Ham-D.

AIM

To study the IRR of scoring video-recorded interviews for 21-item Ham-D.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighteen subjects with major depressive disorder involved in a larger study were interviewed using the semi-structured clinical interview of the 21-item Ham-D by a primary rater after informed consent. These interviews were video-recorded and portions edited to ensure rater blinding. Subsequently, the video-recorded interviews were rated by a "blind" rater. Both rated the different sub-domains of Ham-D according to Rhoades and Overall (1983). IRR was evaluated using intra-class correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

Excellent IRR was observed (0.9891) between the two raters. This was true for each of the primary factors and super-factors.

CONCLUSION

Video recorded 21-item Ham-D has excellentIRR. Video-recorded interviews of Ham-D can be reliably used to blind raters in research.

摘要

背景

汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(Ham-D)是最广泛用于评估抑郁症的临床医生评定量表。目前还没有印度研究检验过 21 项汉密尔顿抑郁量表的视频记录访谈的评分者间信度(IRR)。

目的

研究 21 项汉密尔顿抑郁量表的视频记录访谈的评分者间信度。

材料和方法

18 名患有重度抑郁症的受试者在知情同意后,由主要评估者使用半结构式临床访谈 21 项汉密尔顿抑郁量表对他们进行访谈。这些访谈被录像,并剪辑部分内容以确保评估者盲法。随后,录像访谈由一名“盲”评估者进行评分。两位评估者均根据 Rhoades 和 Overall(1983)的方法对汉密尔顿抑郁量表的不同子域进行评分。使用组内相关系数评估 IRR。

结果

两位评估者之间观察到极好的 IRR(0.9891)。这对于主要因素和超因素中的每一个都是如此。

结论

视频记录的 21 项汉密尔顿抑郁量表具有极好的评分者间信度。汉密尔顿抑郁量表的视频记录访谈可以可靠地用于研究中的盲法评估者。

相似文献

4
Inter-rater reliability of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale as a diagnostic and outcome measure of depression in primary care.
J Affect Disord. 2008 Dec;111(2-3):204-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.02.013. Epub 2008 Mar 28.
5
Urdu translation of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression: Results of a validation study.
Pak J Med Sci. 2016 Nov-Dec;32(6):1479-1483. doi: 10.12669/pjms.326.11399.
6
Inter-rater reliability among psychiatrists when assessing depression according to the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale.
Nord J Psychiatry. 2021 Nov;75(8):607-613. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2021.1918240. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
7
The Hamilton Rating Scales for Depression: A Critical Review of Clinimetric Properties of Different Versions.
Psychother Psychosom. 2020;89(3):133-150. doi: 10.1159/000506879. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
8
A comparison of face-to-face and remote assessment of inter-rater reliability on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale via videoconferencing.
Psychiatry Res. 2008 Feb 28;158(1):99-103. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2007.06.025. Epub 2007 Oct 24.
9
Evaluating rater competency for CNS clinical trials.
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2006 Jun;26(3):308-10. doi: 10.1097/01.jcp.0000219049.33008.b7.

引用本文的文献

1
Indian scales and inventories.
Indian J Psychiatry. 2010 Jan;52(Suppl 1):S378-85. doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.69273.
2
An overview of Indian research in depression.
Indian J Psychiatry. 2010 Jan;52(Suppl 1):S178-88. doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.69231.

本文引用的文献

1
Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.
Psychol Bull. 1979 Mar;86(2):420-8. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.86.2.420.
2
Rater bias in a blinded randomized placebo-controlled psychiatry trial.
Stat Med. 2006 Aug 30;25(16):2762-70. doi: 10.1002/sim.2405.
3
The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: has the gold standard become a lead weight?
Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Dec;161(12):2163-77. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.12.2163.
4
Dimensional structure of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Psychiatry Res. 2004 Feb 15;125(2):171-80. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2003.11.003.
5
A rating scale for depression.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960 Feb;23(1):56-62. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56.
7
Standardizing the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: past, present, and future.
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2001;251 Suppl 2:II6-12. doi: 10.1007/BF03035120.
8
Exactly what does the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale measure?
J Psychiatr Res. 1993 Jul-Sep;27(3):259-73. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(93)90037-3.
9
Suspended judgment. Seeing through the double-masked design: a commentary.
Control Clin Trials. 1994 Aug;15(4):244-6. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(94)90041-8.
10
Factorial structure and factor reliability of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression.
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1988 Aug;78(2):113-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1988.tb06311.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验