Suppr超能文献

使用体外测试鉴定商业产品中的意外致敏性杂质:案例研究。

Use of in vitro testing to identify an unexpected skin sensitizing impurity in a commercial product: a case study.

机构信息

Givaudan Schweiz AG, Ueberlandstrasse 138, CH-8600 Duebendorf, Switzerland.

出版信息

Toxicol In Vitro. 2010 Mar;24(2):411-6. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2009.10.015. Epub 2009 Oct 31.

Abstract

Due to regulatory constraints and ethical considerations, the quest for alternatives to animal testing has gained a new momentum. In general, animal welfare considerations and compliance with regulations are the key drivers for this research. Mechanistically based in vitro tests addressing specific toxicological questions can yield new information, for example on reactive components, and thus in certain cases the in vitro tests are not only second choice replacements of a 'gold standard' animal test but can also be used to develop safer products. Here we report a case study from the in vitro investigation on the commercial fragrance chemical Azurone. This compound was found to be a moderate skin sensitizer in the LLNA, whereas the structurally closely similar compound Calone is a non-sensitizer. A peptide reactivity assay indicated, that indeed Azurone yields peptide depletion, thus the in vitro assays confirmed the animal test result. LC-MS analysis of the peptide reactivity sample showed the presence of peptide adducts of unexpected molecular weight. They were consistent with the reaction of the peptide with a catechol related to Azurone. Detailed analytics indicated that indeed this catechol is present in the original batches as an impurity, but it has escaped quality control analysis, as it is not detectable in routine GC-analysis. A new purified batch was prepared, re-tested in the in vitro assays and predicted by the tests to be a non-sensitizer. A confirmatory LLNA test indeed yielded a significantly (10-fold) higher EC3 value of the new batch, but the LLNA was still positive. A dose-response study in the EpiSkin assay indicated that this molecule still has a significant skin irritation potential, which may generate the weak positive signal in the LLNA. This case study illustrates how the mechanistically based in vitro LC-MS peptide reactivity assay can be used to contribute to the understanding of the sensitization mechanism of a commercial product and help to define a safer product specification.

摘要

由于监管限制和伦理考虑,替代动物测试的研究又取得了新的进展。总的来说,动物福利考虑和法规遵从性是推动这项研究的关键因素。针对特定毒理学问题的基于机制的体外测试可以提供新的信息,例如关于反应性成分的信息,因此在某些情况下,体外测试不仅是“黄金标准”动物测试的替代方法,而且还可以用于开发更安全的产品。在这里,我们报告了一个关于商业香水化学品 Azurone 的体外研究案例。该化合物在 LLNA 中被发现是一种中度皮肤致敏剂,而结构上非常相似的化合物 Calone 则是非致敏剂。肽反应性测定表明,Azurone 确实会导致肽耗竭,因此体外测试证实了动物测试结果。肽反应性样品的 LC-MS 分析表明存在意想不到分子量的肽加合物。它们与 Azurone 与儿茶酚的反应一致。详细分析表明,实际上这种儿茶酚以杂质的形式存在于原始批次中,但由于它在常规 GC 分析中无法检测到,因此逃避了质量控制分析。制备了新的纯化批次,在体外测试中重新测试,并根据测试预测为非致敏剂。确认性 LLNA 测试确实使新批次的 EC3 值显著(10 倍)升高,但 LLNA 仍然为阳性。EpiSkin 测定中的剂量反应研究表明,该分子仍具有显著的皮肤刺激性潜力,这可能会在 LLNA 中产生微弱的阳性信号。这个案例研究说明了基于机制的体外 LC-MS 肽反应性测定如何有助于理解商业产品的致敏机制,并有助于定义更安全的产品规格。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验