Animal Behaviour and Welfare Group, Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, UK.
Pest Manag Sci. 2010 Mar;66(3):231-7. doi: 10.1002/ps.1870.
There remains a lack of a clear overarching policy framework for decision-making in pest control programmes. In comparison, ethical principles have been extensively developed for scientific procedures, such as those underlying the UK's Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986. This paper assesses the extent to which the principles and methodology underlying the act and secondary guidance could be used to provide principles of rodent management. Useful principles include that any programme has a legitimate purpose; that methods are used only if the harms are outweighed by the benefits; that harms are minimised by refinement, replacement and reduction and that there is personal responsibility. The usefulness and implications for pest control of each principle and the overall approach are discussed.
在害虫防治计划的决策方面,仍然缺乏明确的总体政策框架。相比之下,伦理原则已经广泛应用于科学程序,例如 1986 年英国的《动物(科学程序)法案》所依据的原则。本文评估了该法案及其二级指导所依据的原则和方法在多大程度上可以用于提供鼠类管理原则。有用的原则包括任何计划都有合法目的;只有在利益超过危害时才使用方法;通过精细化、替代和减少来最小化危害,并且个人有责任。讨论了每个原则和整体方法对害虫防治的有用性和影响。