负责任的酒精饮料服务：一项关于服务员、经理及环境影响的研究
Responsible alcohol service: a study of server, manager, and environmental impact.
作者信息
Howard-Pitney B, Johnson M D, Altman D G, Hopkins R, Hammond N
机构信息
Stanford Center for Research in Disease Prevention, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94304-1885.
出版信息
Am J Public Health. 1991 Feb;81(2):197-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.81.2.197.
Abstract
A responsible alcohol-service training program was evaluated for its impact on changing beliefs, knowledge, and behavior in 97 servers and 43 managers and on changing establishment policies that encourage safer drinking environments. The training program had a significant impact on changing the beliefs and knowledge of both servers and managers. Observation 4 to 6 weeks after training showed no effects on server behavior, but there was a tendency toward more establishment policies compared with controls.
摘要
对一项负责任的酒精服务培训计划进行了评估，以了解其对97名服务员和43名经理的信念、知识和行为改变的影响，以及对鼓励更安全饮酒环境的场所政策改变的影响。该培训计划对改变服务员和经理的信念和知识有显著影响。培训后4至6周的观察表明，对服务员行为没有影响，但与对照组相比，有更多场所政策的趋势。
相似文献
1
Responsible alcohol service: a study of server, manager, and environmental impact.负责任的酒精饮料服务：一项关于服务员、经理及环境影响的研究
Am J Public Health. 1991 Feb;81(2):197-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.81.2.197.
2
Long-term effects of a community-wide alcohol server training intervention.一项社区范围的酒精饮料服务人员培训干预措施的长期效果。
J Stud Alcohol. 1999 Jan;60(1):27-36. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1999.60.27.
3
Factors influencing the effectiveness of server-intervention education.影响服务器干预教育效果的因素。
J Stud Alcohol. 1991 Sep;52(5):389-97. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1991.52.389.
4
Changes in alcohol policies and practices in bars and restaurants after completion of manager-focused responsible service training.完成以经理为重点的负责任服务培训后，酒吧和餐馆在酒精政策和实践方面的变化。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2018 Mar;37(3):356-364. doi: 10.1111/dar.12629. Epub 2017 Nov 19.
5
A cognitive analysis of server intervention policies: perceptions of bar owners and servers.对服务器干预政策的认知分析：酒吧老板和服务员的看法。
J Stud Alcohol. 1999 Jan;60(1):37-46. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1999.60.37.
6
The interaction between policy and research in the implementation of server training.在服务器培训实施过程中政策与研究之间的相互作用。
Addiction. 1993 Jan;88 Suppl:105S-113S. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02168.x.
7
Evaluation of a local designated driver and responsible server program to prevent drinking and driving.评估一项旨在预防酒后驾车的当地指定司机及责任服务员计划。
J Drug Educ. 1997;27(4):321-33. doi: 10.2190/2RJA-22Y1-R15T-ULM8.
8
Effects of a Hybrid Online and In-Person Training Program Designed to Reduce Alcohol Sales to Obviously Intoxicated Patrons.一项旨在减少向明显醉酒顾客售酒的线上线下混合培训项目的效果。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2017 Mar;78(2):268-275. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2017.78.268.
9
Research needs and opportunities in server intervention programs.服务器干预计划的研究需求与机遇。
Health Educ Q. 1989 Fall;16(3):429-38. doi: 10.1177/109019818901600310.
10
Evaluation of a responsible beverage service and enforcement program: Effects on bar patron intoxication and potential impaired driving by young adults.一项负责任的酒水服务与执法计划的评估：对酒吧顾客醉酒情况及年轻人潜在酒驾行为的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2017 Aug 18;18(6):557-565. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2017.1285401. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
引用本文的文献
1
Does a place of last drink initiative affect the likelihood of alcohol sales to obviously intoxicated patrons?“最后饮酒地点”倡议是否会影响向明显醉酒顾客销售酒精饮料的可能性？
Alcohol Clin Exp Res (Hoboken). 2024 Jun;48(6):1132-1141. doi: 10.1111/acer.15325. Epub 2024 May 27.
2
Does a Place of Last Drink (POLD) Initiative Affect Alcohol Serving Staff Attitudes and Perceptions Related to Overservice of Alcohol?“最后饮酒点（POLD）”计划是否会影响酒水服务人员与过量供酒相关的态度和认知？
Subst Use Misuse. 2024;59(4):478-485. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2023.2280578. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
3
Alcohol Service Practices: A Survey of Bar and Restaurant Managers.酒精饮料服务规范：酒吧与餐厅经理调查
J Drug Educ. 2016 Dec;46(3-4):64-81. doi: 10.1177/0047237917724408. Epub 2017 Aug 11.
4
Changes in alcohol policies and practices in bars and restaurants after completion of manager-focused responsible service training.完成以经理为重点的负责任服务培训后，酒吧和餐馆在酒精政策和实践方面的变化。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2018 Mar;37(3):356-364. doi: 10.1111/dar.12629. Epub 2017 Nov 19.
5
Effects of a Hybrid Online and In-Person Training Program Designed to Reduce Alcohol Sales to Obviously Intoxicated Patrons.一项旨在减少向明显醉酒顾客售酒的线上线下混合培训项目的效果。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2017 Mar;78(2):268-275. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2017.78.268.
6
A cost analysis of web-enhanced training to reduce alcohol sales to intoxicated bar patrons.一项关于通过网络强化培训来减少向醉酒酒吧顾客售酒的成本分析。
J Alcohol Drug Educ. 2015 Aug;59(2):25-42.
7
Why should I comply? Sellers' accounts for (non-)compliance with legal age limits for alcohol sales.我为什么要遵守？酒类销售法律年龄限制的遵守情况的销售者解释。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2012 Jan 23;7:5. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-7-5.
8
Improving the alcohol retail environment to reduce youth access: a randomized community trial of a best practices toolkit intervention.改善酒精零售环境以减少青少年获取途径：最佳实践工具包干预的随机社区试验。
J Community Health. 2011 Jun;36(3):357-66. doi: 10.1007/s10900-010-9316-8.
9
Social-cognitive correlates of protective drinking behaviors and alcohol-related consequences in college students.大学生保护性饮酒行为和与酒精相关后果的社会认知相关性。
Addict Behav. 2009 Nov;34(11):911-7. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2009.05.016. Epub 2009 May 27.
10
Blood alcohol concentrations among bar patrons: A multi-level study of drinking behavior.酒吧顾客的血液酒精浓度：饮酒行为的多层次研究。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009 Jun 1;102(1-3):41-8. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.12.015. Epub 2009 Feb 27.
本文引用的文献
1
Research on drinking locations of alcohol-impaired drivers: implications for prevention policies.对酒精影响下驾驶者饮酒地点的研究：对预防政策的启示
J Public Health Policy. 1985 Dec;6(4):510-25.
2
Training bar personnel to prevent drunken driving: a field evaluation.培训酒吧工作人员预防酒后驾车：一项实地评估。
Am J Public Health. 1987 Aug;77(8):952-4. doi: 10.2105/ajph.77.8.952.
3
Research needs and opportunities in server intervention programs.服务器干预计划的研究需求与机遇。
Health Educ Q. 1989 Fall;16(3):429-38. doi: 10.1177/109019818901600310.
4
The primary prevention of alcohol problems: a critical review of the research literature.酒精问题的一级预防：对研究文献的批判性综述。
J Stud Alcohol. 1989 Jan;50(1):54-88. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1989.50.54.
Zotero 插件