Labor Education and Research Center, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403-1289, USA.
Appl Ergon. 2010 May;41(3):477-83. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2009.10.003. Epub 2009 Nov 18.
Masons working with concrete masonry unit block have high rates of work-related musculoskeletal disorders to the low back and shoulders associated with repetitively lifting and buttering heavy block. A new material, autoclaved aerated concrete, may reduce the risk of shoulder and back injury but, ergonomic evaluation is needed. This study evaluated shoulder exposure parameters, low back stress, and worker perceptions in two groups of journey level masons, one using CMU and the other using AAC block. Results indicate that for the left arm AAC masons spent significantly more time than CMU masons in static (38.2% versus 31.1%, respectively), and less time in slow motions (48.2% versus 52.2%, respectively) and faster motions (13.6% versus 16.7%, respectively) (p<0.05). CMU masons had significantly greater shoulder and low back pain (p=0.009) and they held block significantly longer than AAC masons (p<0.001). Low back compressive forces were high for both materials. Masons handling AAC demonstrated less left upper extremity stress but both materials were estimated to be hazardous to the low back.
使用混凝土砌块的泥瓦匠患有与重复性举升和涂抹重物相关的下背部和肩部肌肉骨骼疾病的比率很高。一种新型材料,蒸压加气混凝土,可能会降低肩部和背部受伤的风险,但需要进行人体工程学评估。本研究评估了两组熟练泥瓦匠的肩部暴露参数、下背部压力和工人感知,一组使用 CMU,另一组使用 AAC 砌块。结果表明,对于左手臂,AAC 泥瓦匠在静态(分别为 38.2%和 31.1%)中花费的时间明显多于 CMU 泥瓦匠,在慢速运动(分别为 48.2%和 52.2%)和快速运动(分别为 13.6%和 16.7%)中花费的时间明显减少(p<0.05)。CMU 泥瓦匠的肩部和下背部疼痛明显更严重(p=0.009),他们持砖的时间明显长于 AAC 泥瓦匠(p<0.001)。两种材料的下背部压缩力都很高。使用 AAC 的泥瓦匠上肢的压力较小,但两种材料都估计对下背部有危害。