Sports Technology Institute, Loughborough University, Leicestershire, United Kingdom.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010 Feb;42(2):381-7. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181b46f3a.
To determine the optimal crank length and crank-axle height for maximum power production during standing arm cranking ("grinding").
Nine elite professional America's Cup grinders (age = 36 +/- 2 yr, body mass = 104 +/- 1 kg, body fat = 13% +/- 2%) performed eight maximal 6-s sprints on an adjustable standing arm-crank ergometer fitted with an SRM power crank. The protocol included crank lengths of 162, 199, 236, and 273 mm and crank-axle heights of 850, 950, 1050, and 1150 mm. Peak power, ground reaction forces, and joint angles were determined and compared for different crank lengths and crank-axle heights with repeated-measures ANOVA.
Peak power was significantly different between crank lengths (P = 0.006), with 162 mm lower than all others (P < 0.03). Optimal crank length was 12.3% of arm span or 241 +/- 9 mm for this cohort of athletes. Peak power was significantly less for the crank-axle height of 850 mm compared with 1150 mm (P = 0.01). The optimal crank-axle height for peak power was between 50% and 60% of stature (950-1150 mm in this study). Hip flexion was greater at the lowest crank-axle height (850 mm) than at 1050 and 1150 mm (P < 0.01), and the resultant ground reaction force was also reduced compared with all other heights, indicating greater weight bearing by the upper body.
Changes in crank length and crank-axle height influence performance during maximal standing arm-crank ergometry. These results suggest that standard leg-cycle crank lengths are inappropriate for maximal arm-cranking performance. In addition, a crank-axle height of <50% of stature, which is typically used in America's Cup sailing, may attenuate performance.
确定在站立臂曲柄(“研磨”)过程中产生最大功率的最佳曲柄长度和曲柄轴高度。
九名精英职业美洲杯研磨器(年龄= 36 +/- 2 岁,体重= 104 +/- 1 公斤,体脂= 13% +/- 2%)在配备有 SRM 功率曲柄的可调节站立臂曲柄测功机上进行了八次最大 6 秒冲刺。该方案包括 162、199、236 和 273 毫米的曲柄长度和 850、950、1050 和 1150 毫米的曲柄轴高度。使用重复测量 ANOVA 比较不同曲柄长度和曲柄轴高度下的峰值功率、地面反作用力和关节角度。
曲柄长度之间的峰值功率差异显著(P = 0.006),162 毫米的曲柄长度明显低于其他所有曲柄长度(P < 0.03)。对于该组运动员,最佳曲柄长度为臂展的 12.3%或 241 +/- 9 毫米。与 1150 毫米相比,曲柄轴高度为 850 毫米时的峰值功率明显较低(P = 0.01)。对于峰值功率而言,最佳曲柄轴高度为身高的 50%至 60%之间(在本研究中为 950-1150 毫米)。在最低曲柄轴高度(850 毫米)时,髋关节屈曲度大于 1050 和 1150 毫米时(P < 0.01),并且与所有其他高度相比,地面反作用力也降低,表明上身承受的重量更大。
曲柄长度和曲柄轴高度的变化会影响最大站立臂曲柄测功的性能。这些结果表明,标准的腿部曲柄长度不适合最大臂曲柄性能。此外,通常用于美洲杯帆船赛的曲柄轴高度<身高的 50%可能会降低性能。