Alfa Institute of Biomedical Sciences (AIBS), 9 Neapoleos Street, 15123 Marousi, Athens, Greece.
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2010 Feb;35(2):101-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2009.10.001. Epub 2009 Nov 24.
Inhaled antimicrobial agents are used for the treatment of respiratory tract infections due to Gram-negative bacteria, mainly Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The effectiveness of the inhaled antimicrobial therapy is believed to correlate with the delivery system used. The objective of this review was to search for data supporting differentiation in clinical effectiveness between systems used for pulmonary delivery of antibiotics, including delivery using disposable nebulisers and oxygen flow. Published studies in peer-reviewed journals comparing the effectiveness of pulmonary drug delivery systems for antimicrobial agents were retrieved. The studies found were either in vitro or Phase I and Phase II clinical studies. Differences in in vitro parameters may affect the in vivo efficacy of the devices, and in vivo differences may imply differences in clinical effectiveness. The main difference between newer and older devices is the time needed for antibiotic delivery. Interpretation and association with clinical effectiveness is difficult. In conclusion, Phase III clinical trials comparing the clinical effectiveness of delivery systems, including delivery using a hospital's oxygen flow and disposable nebulisers, do not exist. Cost is an important parameter, which may be counterbalanced in cystic fibrosis patients by a better quality of life and a greater adherence to treatment.
吸入性抗生素被用于治疗革兰氏阴性菌(主要为铜绿假单胞菌)引起的呼吸道感染。吸入性抗生素疗法的有效性被认为与所使用的输送系统有关。本综述旨在寻找支持抗生素肺部输送系统之间临床疗效差异的数据,包括使用一次性雾化器和氧气流量输送。检索了发表在同行评议期刊上的比较抗生素肺部输送系统有效性的研究。研究结果既有体外研究,也有 I 期和 II 期临床试验。体外参数的差异可能会影响器械的体内疗效,而体内的差异可能意味着临床疗效的差异。新型和旧型器械的主要区别在于抗生素输送所需的时间。解释和与临床疗效的关联很困难。总之,目前尚不存在比较输送系统临床疗效的 III 期临床试验,包括使用医院氧气流量和一次性雾化器的输送。成本是一个重要的参数,但在囊性纤维化患者中,生活质量的提高和治疗依从性的增强可能会抵消成本。