Suppr超能文献

[TNM分期及治疗方式对非小细胞肺癌预后的影响]

[Impact of TNM staging and treatment mode on the prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer].

作者信息

Yu Da-Ping, Bai Lian-Qi, Xu Shao-Fa, Han Ming, Wang Zi-Tong

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Beijing Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Thoracic Tumor, Beijing Chest Hospital, Beijing 101149, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2009 Jun;31(6):465-8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study the impact of TNM staging and combined treatment mode on the survival of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

METHODS

From January 1997 to December 2002, 987 NSCLC patients were surgically treated in this hospital. Of those, 574 received combined modality therapy (surgery + chemotherapy/radiotherapy), while 413 underwent operation alone. Their clinicopathological data were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

The 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year overall survival rates were 87.7%, 57.5%, 54.6% and 54.5%, respectively, for the whole group, which were 90.6%, 57.5%, 54.3% and 54.1% for the combined therapy group versus 83.8%, 57.6%, 55.2% and 55.2% for the group treated by surgical resection alone. The 1-year survival rate of the combined therapy group was significantly higher than that of the surgical resection alone group (90.6% vs. 83.8%) (P<0.01). With regard to the T factor, 5-year survival rate of the combined therapy group (surgery + radiotherapy) was higher than that of surgery alone group, especially in T4 cases (43.6% vs. 12.7%), with a significant difference between them (P<0. 05). As for the N factor, the 1-year survival rate of NO patients in the combined therapy group (surgery + chemotherapy/radiotherapy) was significantly higher than that of surgery alone group (94.4%, 97.9% vs. 90.0%) (P<0.05). The 1-year survival rate of N1 patients in the combined therapy group (surgery + chemotherapy or + chemotherapy and radiotherapy) was 91.7% and 100% versus 82.9% in the surgery alone group (P<0.01); The 1- and 3-year survival rates of N2 patients in the combined modality therapy group (surgery + chemotherapy) were 82.1% and 37.3%, while those of the surgery alone group were 69.4% and 26.5%, respectively, with a significant difference (P<0.05, P<0.01). All the severity of primary tumor, distance of lymph node involvement, and distant tumor metastasis significantly worsen the prognosis of the patients.

CONCLUSION

The prognosis in NSCLC patients treated with combined modality therapy (surgery + chemotherapy/radiotherapy) is better than that with surgery alone. The larger the original tumor and the farther the lymph node and tumor metastases, the worse the prognosis is for NSCLC patients.

摘要

目的

探讨TNM分期及综合治疗模式对非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者生存的影响。

方法

1997年1月至2002年12月,本院对987例NSCLC患者实施手术治疗。其中,574例接受综合治疗(手术+化疗/放疗),413例仅接受手术治疗。对其临床病理资料进行回顾性分析。

结果

全组患者1年、3年、5年和10年总生存率分别为87.7%、57.5%、54.6%和54.5%,综合治疗组分别为90.6%、57.5%、54.3%和54.1%,单纯手术切除组分别为83.8%、57.6%、55.2%和55.2%。综合治疗组1年生存率显著高于单纯手术切除组(90.6%对83.8%)(P<0.01)。关于T因素,综合治疗组(手术+放疗)5年生存率高于单纯手术组,尤其是T4病例(43.6%对12.7%),两者差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。对于N因素,综合治疗组(手术+化疗/放疗)中NO患者1年生存率显著高于单纯手术组(94.4%、97.9%对90.0%)(P<0.05)。综合治疗组(手术+化疗或+化疗及放疗)中N1患者1年生存率分别为91.7%和100%,单纯手术组为82.9%(P<0.01);综合治疗组(手术+化疗)中N2患者1年和3年生存率分别为82.1%和37.3%,单纯手术组分别为69.4%和26.5%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05,P<0.01)。原发肿瘤的严重程度、淋巴结受累距离及远处肿瘤转移均显著恶化患者预后。

结论

综合治疗(手术+化疗/放疗)的NSCLC患者预后优于单纯手术患者。NSCLC患者原发肿瘤越大、淋巴结及肿瘤转移越远,预后越差。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验