Department of Periodontics, School of Dental Medicine, Southern Illinois University, Alton, IL 62002, USA.
J Periodontol. 2009 Dec;80(12):1955-62. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.090149.
It has been suggested that eccentric occlusal forces may be an etiologic factor for abfraction lesions. It has also been suggested that traumatic occlusal forces may have a damaging effect on the periodontal tissues. The purpose of this study was to determine whether associations were present between premature contacts in centric relation (PCCR), clinical attachment loss, and abfraction lesions.
Forty-six subjects were examined. Within subjects, the mean attachment loss was determined for teeth with and without PCCR and for teeth with and without abfractions. In addition, teeth with PCCR (experimental group) were matched with contralateral teeth without PCCR (control group). Comparisons between groups were made with the Wilcoxon signed rank test, Wilcoxon rank sums test, and the Spearman rho correlation coefficient.
The results demonstrated that attachment loss increased with age. Within subjects, teeth with abfraction lesions had significantly more buccal attachment loss than teeth without abfraction lesions (P <0.01). The majority of abfractions and PCCR occurred in premolars. The presence of PCCR had no influence on the appearance of an abfraction lesion or increased attachment loss. Similarly, subjects who exhibited abfractions had similar attachment loss as those subjects without abfraction lesions.
Within the same patient, teeth with abfractions presented more attachment loss than those without abfractions. However, associations were not demonstrated between PCCR and the presence of abfractions or increased attachment loss. Future studies are needed to improve the knowledge regarding interactions among occlusal factors, attachment loss, and abfractions.
有人认为偏侧咬合力量可能是 abfraction 病变的病因。也有人认为创伤性咬合力量可能对牙周组织有破坏作用。本研究旨在确定早接触(centric relation)和临床附着丧失与 abfraction 病变之间是否存在关联。
对 46 名受试者进行检查。在受试者内,确定具有和不具有早接触(centric relation)的牙齿以及具有和不具有 abfraction 病变的牙齿的平均附着丧失。此外,将具有早接触(centric relation)的牙齿(实验组)与不具有早接触(centric relation)的对侧牙齿(对照组)相匹配。使用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验、Wilcoxon 秩和检验和 Spearman rho 相关系数对组间进行比较。
结果表明,附着丧失随年龄增长而增加。在受试者内,具有 abfraction 病变的牙齿的颊侧附着丧失明显多于没有 abfraction 病变的牙齿(P <0.01)。大多数 abfraction 病变和早接触(centric relation)发生在前磨牙。早接触(centric relation)的存在对 abfraction 病变或增加的附着丧失的出现没有影响。同样,表现出 abfraction 病变的受试者的附着丧失与没有 abfraction 病变的受试者相似。
在同一患者中,具有 abfraction 病变的牙齿的附着丧失多于没有 abfraction 病变的牙齿。然而,早接触(centric relation)与 abfraction 病变的存在或增加的附着丧失之间没有显示出关联。需要进一步的研究来提高对咬合因素、附着丧失和 abfraction 病变之间相互作用的认识。