Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit of Emergency Department, Careggi Teaching Hospital, Viale Morgagni 85, 50139, Florence, Italy.
Crit Care. 2009;13(6):R194. doi: 10.1186/cc8193. Epub 2009 Dec 5.
Critically ill surgical patients frequently develop intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) leading to abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) with subsequent high mortality. We compared two temporary abdominal closure systems (Bogota bag and vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) device) in intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) control.
This prospective study with a historical control included 66 patients admitted to a medical and surgical intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary care referral center (Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy) from January 2006 to April 2009. The control group included patients consecutively treated with the Bogota bag (Jan 2006-Oct 2007), whereas the prospective group was comprised of patients treated with a VAC. All patients underwent abdominal decompressive surgery. Groups were compared based upon their IAP, SOFA score, serial arterial lactates, the duration of having their abdomen open, the need for mechanical ventilation (MV) along with length of ICU and hospital stay and mortality. Data were collected from the time of abdominal decompression until the end of pressure monitoring.
The Bogota and VAC groups were similar with regards to demography, admission diagnosis, severity of illness, and IAH grading. The VAC system was more effective in controlling IAP (P < 0.01) and normalizing serum lactates (P < 0.001) as compared to the Bogota bag during the first 24 hours after surgical decompression. There was no significant difference between the SOFA scores. When compared to the Bogota, the VAC group had a faster abdominal closure time (4.4 vs 6.6 days, P = 0.025), shorter duration of MV (7.1 vs 9.9 days, P = 0.039), decreased ICU length of stay (LOS) (13.3 vs 19.2 days, P = 0.024) and hospital LOS (28.5 vs 34.9 days; P = 0.019). Mortality rate did not differ significantly between the two groups.
Patients with abdominal compartment syndrome who were treated with VAC decompression had a faster abdominal closure rate and earlier discharge from the ICU as compared to similar patients treated with the Bogota bag.
危重症外科患者常发生腹腔内高压(IAH),进而导致腹腔间隔室综合征(ACS),死亡率高。我们比较了两种临时腹部闭合系统(Bogota 袋和负压辅助闭合(VAC)装置)在控制腹腔内压(IAP)方面的效果。
这项前瞻性研究有一个历史对照,纳入了 2006 年 1 月至 2009 年 4 月期间一家三级转诊中心(佛罗伦萨的 Careggi 医院)内科和外科重症监护病房(ICU)收治的 66 名患者。对照组为 2006 年 1 月至 2007 年 10 月期间连续接受 Bogota 袋治疗的患者,而前瞻性组为接受 VAC 治疗的患者。所有患者均接受腹部减压手术。根据腹腔内压(IAP)、SOFA 评分、连续动脉乳酸水平、腹部开放时间、机械通气(MV)需求、ICU 和住院时间以及死亡率比较两组。数据从腹部减压开始收集,直至压力监测结束。
Bogota 组和 VAC 组在人口统计学、入院诊断、疾病严重程度和 IAH 分级方面相似。与 Bogota 袋相比,VAC 系统在腹部减压后 24 小时内更有效地控制 IAP(P < 0.01)和血清乳酸水平(P < 0.001)。SOFA 评分无显著差异。与 Bogota 相比,VAC 组腹部闭合时间更快(4.4 天 vs. 6.6 天,P = 0.025),MV 持续时间更短(7.1 天 vs. 9.9 天,P = 0.039),ICU 住院时间更短(13.3 天 vs. 19.2 天,P = 0.024)和住院时间更短(28.5 天 vs. 34.9 天,P = 0.019)。两组死亡率无显著差异。
与接受 Bogota 袋减压治疗的类似患者相比,接受 VAC 减压治疗的腹腔间隔室综合征患者腹部闭合率更高,更早从 ICU 出院。