Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research Centre, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada T1J 4B1.
Int J Food Microbiol. 2010 Jan 31;137(1):40-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.11.008. Epub 2009 Nov 17.
This study investigated antimicrobial-resistant (AR) Escherichia coli isolated from "farm-to-fork" production of cattle fed diets containing the antimicrobial growth promoter (AGP) chlortetracycline plus sulfamethazine (44ppm each, AS700) or no AGP (control). For each treatment, samples included: feces just prior to euthanization; hides after euthanization; intestinal digesta from the lower digestive tract; carcasses immediately after evisceration and after 24h in the chiller; and ground beef stored at 5 degrees C for 1 and 8days. Samples were also collected from the abattoir environment and from air during hide removal. Total, ampicillin (Amp(r))-, and tetracycline (Tet(r))-resistant E. coli were isolated on MacConkey agar or MacConkey agar containing ampicillin or tetracycline, respectively. Amp(r) and Tet(r)E. coli were isolated from the feces and hides of all cattle. Compared to the control, the prevalence of Amp(r) (26.5% vs. 7.9%) and Tet(r) (50.9% vs. 12.6%) E. coli was greater in feces from AS700 treated animals (P<0.05), but was similar between treatments for hide samples (P>0.05). The prevalence of carcass or ground beef contamination with AR E. coli was not different between treatments. Resistant E. coli were isolated from the abattoir environment after processing of both groups of cattle. Susceptibilities to 11 antimicrobials and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analyses were conducted on 360 Amp(r) and Tet(r)E. coli isolates. Twenty-five antibiogram profiles were detected, with isolates exhibiting resistance to up to 9 antimicrobials. Most (28.2%) Amp(r)E. coli were also resistant to streptomycin and tetracycline, whereas Tet(r)E. coli (53.5%) were mainly resistant to only tetracycline. Thirty one genotypes were detected by PFGE with most isolates from meat and environmental samples having similar genetic profiles to isolates from hides or digesta. These data demonstrate that antimicrobial-resistant E. coli can contaminate meat products during slaughter and enter the food chain regardless of whether or not cattle are administered AGP. The abundance of AR E. coli on the hides of animals is likely a key element for controlling end-product contamination.
本研究调查了在含有抗菌生长促进剂(AGP)金霉素加磺胺嘧啶(44ppm 各,AS700)或无 AGP(对照)的日粮喂养的“从农场到餐桌”生产的牛中分离出的耐抗生素(AR)大肠杆菌。对于每种处理,样本包括:在安乐死前的粪便;安乐死后的皮;下消化道的肠道内容物;屠宰后立即和在冷风机中 24 小时后的胴体;和在 5°C 下储存 1 天和 8 天的碎牛肉。还从屠宰场环境和皮肤去除过程中的空气中采集样本。在麦康凯琼脂或含有氨苄西林或四环素的麦康凯琼脂上分离出总、氨苄西林(Amp(r))和四环素(Tet(r))耐药大肠杆菌。从所有牛的粪便和皮中分离出 Amp(r)和 Tet(r)大肠杆菌。与对照组相比,AS700 处理动物粪便中 Amp(r)(26.5%比 7.9%)和 Tet(r)(50.9%比 12.6%)大肠杆菌的流行率更高(P<0.05),但在处理皮样时两组之间相似(P>0.05)。处理之间胴体或碎牛肉中耐抗生素大肠杆菌的污染率没有差异。在两组牛的处理后,从屠宰场环境中分离出耐药大肠杆菌。对 360 株 Amp(r)和 Tet(r)大肠杆菌进行了 11 种抗生素的敏感性和脉冲场凝胶电泳(PFGE)分析。检测到 25 种抗生素图谱,分离株对多达 9 种抗生素表现出耐药性。大多数(28.2%)Amp(r)大肠杆菌还对链霉素和四环素耐药,而 Tet(r)大肠杆菌(53.5%)主要仅对四环素耐药。PFGE 检测到 31 种基因型,大多数来自肉类和环境样本的分离株与来自皮或肠道内容物的分离株具有相似的遗传谱。这些数据表明,无论牛是否使用 AGP,耐药大肠杆菌都可以在屠宰过程中污染肉类产品并进入食物链。动物皮上的 AR 大肠杆菌的丰度很可能是控制最终产品污染的关键因素。