Dipartimento di Scienza Politica, University of Bologna, Strada Maggiore, 45, 40125 Bologna, BO, Italy.
Health Policy. 2010 Apr;95(1):82-9. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.11.006. Epub 2009 Dec 5.
The case argued in this article is that the last two decades have been characterised by distinct waves of healthcare reforms. The first, in the early 1990s, aimed to introduce more patients' choice and greater competition between the components of the healthcare system. The second, from 1995 to 2000, had the opposite aim of introducing greater integration and regulation. From 2000 onwards, the policy issue more in vogue has been the strengthening of patients' rights. Looking for the motives behind these reform strategies, this article aims to show how the ideological leaning of the governments in power affects the content of reform initiatives. The analysis presents evidence drawn from six OECD countries: France, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Sweden and UK.
本文主张,过去二十年的医疗改革呈现出明显的阶段性特征。第一轮改革发生在 20 世纪 90 年代初,旨在增强患者选择权,提升医疗体系各组成部分之间的竞争。第二轮改革从 1995 年持续至 2000 年,目的则刚好相反,即增强整合性和监管力度。从 2000 年起,政策热点更多集中在增强患者权利。本文旨在通过探寻这些改革策略背后的动机,展示执政政府的意识形态倾向如何影响改革措施的内容。分析的证据取自六个经合组织成员国:法国、德国、荷兰、新西兰、瑞典和英国。