Institute of Education, London, United Kingdom.
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Mar;70(5):736-43. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.10.063.
In an attempt to promote patient agency and foster more egalitarian relationships between patients and doctors, discourse concerning health and wellbeing in the UK has increasingly centred around the notion of informed and 'expert' patients who are able to effectively input into the direction and management of their own health care and treatment. While the relationship between a patient and their doctor can play a vital role in influencing the treatment decisions and health-related outcomes of people living with long term illness, little is known about the ways in which people living with HIV actually perceive their relationship with their doctors, nor the implications this may have for the types of treatment they may seek to use and the related information that they share. Drawing on 11 focus group discussions and 20 repeat interviews undertaken in 2008-2009 with HIV-positive adult migrants from Zambia, Zimbabwe and South Africa living in the UK, this paper argues that patient-doctor relationships can be heavily influenced by the perceived legitimacy of different forms of medical knowledge and treatments and by culturally influenced ideas regarding health, wellbeing and agency. Despite a desire amongst some migrants to use 'traditional' medicines from southern Africa as well as other non-biomedical treatments and therapies, the research found that the perceived lack of legitimacy associated with these treatments in the UK rendered their use a largely clandestine activity. At the same time, many patients made clear distinctions concerning issues affecting their immediate health and factors influencing their more general wellbeing, which in turn, impacted upon the information that they chose to share with, or conceal from, their doctors. Such findings challenge assumptions underpinning policy promoting patient agency and have significant and, in cases, potentially adverse implications for the safety and effective administration and management of HIV treatments in African migrant populations and possibly more generally.
为了促进患者的自主权,并在患者和医生之间建立更加平等的关系,英国的健康和福利话语越来越关注那些能够有效参与自身医疗保健和治疗方向和管理的知情和“专家”患者。虽然患者与医生的关系可以在很大程度上影响患有长期疾病的人的治疗决策和健康相关结果,但对于艾滋病毒感染者如何实际看待他们与医生的关系,以及这可能对他们可能寻求使用的治疗类型和他们分享的相关信息产生的影响,人们知之甚少。本文借鉴了 2008-2009 年在英国与来自赞比亚、津巴布韦和南非的艾滋病毒阳性成年移民进行的 11 次焦点小组讨论和 20 次重复访谈,认为医患关系可能会受到不同形式的医学知识和治疗方法的可接受性以及关于健康、福利和自主权的文化观念的影响。尽管一些移民希望使用来自南部非洲的“传统”药物以及其他非生物医学治疗和疗法,但研究发现,这些治疗方法在英国被认为缺乏合法性,这使得它们的使用在很大程度上是一种秘密活动。与此同时,许多患者对影响其即时健康的问题和影响其整体健康的因素做出了明确区分,这反过来又影响了他们选择与医生分享或隐瞒的信息。这些发现挑战了支持患者自主权的政策的假设,并对非洲移民群体中艾滋病毒治疗的安全性和有效管理产生了重大影响,在某些情况下可能会产生不利影响,而且可能更普遍。