Departments of Pediatrics and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati School of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Dec;90(12):2089-95. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.06.018.
Vargus-Adams JN, Martin LK. Measuring what matters in cerebral palsy: a breadth of important domains and outcome measures.
To establish domains of importance for evaluating therapeutic effects in childhood cerebral palsy (CP) and the best means of evaluating those domains.
Delphi iterative survey.
Tertiary pediatric hospital with assessments conducted via mail or Internet.
Youth with CP (n=21), parents of children with CP (n=23), and medical professionals (n=39).
Not applicable.
Identification of "the things you find most important to consider when you evaluate the effects of an intervention for yourself/your child/your patient with cerebral palsy" as domains of concern, followed by the best outcome measures to assess each of the domains, including preference rankings of those measures.
Eight domains of importance were identified: impairment, general health, gross motor skills, self-care/fine motor skills, speech/communication, integration/participation, quality of life, and caregiver issues. All domains were viewed as important with no clear demarcation to allow reduction in number. Only quality of life emerged as being most important. Medical professionals suggested 10 to 27 different outcome measures for assessing each domain. Few of these measures, including the Gross Motor Function Measure and the Cerebral Palsy Quality of Life Questionnaire, were broadly endorsed by the medical professionals.
Parents, youth, and medical professionals identify a wide range of arenas that they would like to see impacted by interventions for CP. These arenas can be consolidated into 8 domains. Although many outcome measures are available to evaluate these domains, few of the measures are widely preferred. Further work may determine optimal assessment strategies and provide guidance for therapeutic decisions.
Vargus-Adams JN,Martin LK。衡量脑瘫治疗效果的重要指标:广泛的重要领域和结果测量。
确定评估儿童脑瘫(CP)治疗效果的重要领域,并确定评估这些领域的最佳方法。
德尔菲迭代调查。
三级儿科医院,通过邮件或互联网进行评估。
脑瘫患儿(n=21)、患儿家长(n=23)和医疗专业人员(n=39)。
不适用。
确定“在评估脑瘫患者自身/子女/患者干预效果时,您认为最重要的考虑因素”作为关注领域,然后确定评估每个领域的最佳结果测量方法,包括对这些测量方法的偏好排名。
确定了 8 个重要领域:损伤、一般健康、粗大运动技能、自理/精细运动技能、言语/沟通、融合/参与、生活质量和照顾者问题。所有领域都被认为很重要,没有明确的划分以减少数量。只有生活质量被认为是最重要的。医疗专业人员建议使用 10 到 27 种不同的结果测量方法来评估每个领域。其中很少有措施,包括粗大运动功能测量和脑瘫生活质量问卷,得到了医疗专业人员的广泛认可。
家长、青少年和医疗专业人员确定了他们希望看到干预措施对 CP 产生影响的广泛领域。这些领域可以合并为 8 个领域。虽然有许多结果测量方法可用于评估这些领域,但很少有措施得到广泛认可。进一步的研究可能会确定最佳评估策略,并为治疗决策提供指导。