Tan Kian Tjon, Shah Nigam, Pritchard Susan A, McGrouther Duncan Angus, Bayat Ardeshir
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Research, Manchester Interdisciplinary Biocentre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Ann Plast Surg. 2010 Jan;64(1):55-8. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31819b6c3a.
Keloid disease is known to have variable clinical behavior in response to therapy and there is no clinicopathologic classification that predicts such varied behavior. The aim of this study was to study the effect of excision margins and other histopathologic characteristics on keloid prognosis.Seventy-five multiethnic patients presenting with keloid scars at a department of plastic and reconstructive surgery during an 11-year period were included in this study. Clinical data was collected and detailed histologic analyses using light microscopy were carried out on archived patient specimens.A detailed histopathologic examination of all tissue samples identified keloid border or margin characteristics which were classified into "circumscribed" (borders clearly-demarcated) and "infiltrative" (borders not clearly-demarcated and not easily-definable). The specific histologic findings were correlated with keloid recurrence which revealed that incomplete peripheral (P < 0.001) and deep excision margins (P < 0.001), as well as infiltrative borders (P < 0.05) were associated with higher 1-year reported recurrence rates.This study has given evidence that incomplete surgical excision are associated with higher recurrence and this may justify the practice of routine histopathologic reporting of keloid excision margins.
瘢痕疙瘩疾病在接受治疗时具有不同的临床行为,并且没有能够预测这种多样行为的临床病理分类。本研究的目的是研究切除边缘和其他组织病理学特征对瘢痕疙瘩预后的影响。本研究纳入了11年间在一家整形和重建外科就诊的75例患有瘢痕疙瘩的多民族患者。收集了临床数据,并对存档的患者标本进行了详细的光学显微镜组织学分析。对所有组织样本进行详细的组织病理学检查,确定瘢痕疙瘩的边界或边缘特征,分为“界限清楚型”(边界清晰)和“浸润型”(边界不清晰且不易界定)。具体的组织学发现与瘢痕疙瘩复发相关,结果显示,周边切除不完整(P < 0.001)和深部切除边缘(P < 0.001)以及浸润性边界(P < 0.05)与报道的1年复发率较高有关。本研究证明,手术切除不完整与较高的复发率相关,这可能为瘢痕疙瘩切除边缘进行常规组织病理学报告的做法提供了依据。