Department of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
J Pain. 2010 Jul;11(7):636-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2009.10.005. Epub 2009 Dec 16.
This study investigated whether inducing central sensitization evokes segmental increases in trigger point pressure sensitivity. We evoked central sensitization at the C(5) segment and validated its presence via mechanical cutaneous sensitivity (brush allodynia) testing. Trigger point pressure sensitivity was quantified using the pain pressure threshold (PPT) value. A 50 cm(2) area of the C(5) dermatome at the right lateral elbow was pretreated with 45 degrees heat for 10 minutes. Test subjects (n = 20) then received topical capsaicin cream (0.075%; Medicis, Toronto, Canada) to the C(5) dermatome, whereas control subjects (n = 20) received a topical placebo cream (Biotherm Massage, Montreal, Canada). PPT readings were recorded from the infraspinatus (C(5,6)) and gluteus medius (L(4,5)S(1)) trigger points at zero (pre-intervention), 10, 20, and 30 minutes after intervention; all PPT readings were normalized to pre-intervention (baseline) values. The difference between the PPT readings at the 2 trigger point sites represents the direct influence of segmental mechanisms on the trigger point sensitivity at the infraspinatus site (PPT(seg)). Test subjects demonstrated statistically significant increases in Total Allodynia scores and significant decreases in PPT(seg) at 10, 20, and 30 minutes after application, when compared with control subjects. These results demonstrate that increases in central sensitization evoke increases in trigger point pressure sensitivity in segmentally related muscles.
Myofascial pain is the most common form of musculoskeletal pain. Myofascial trigger points play an important role in the clinical manifestation of myofascial pain syndrome. Elucidating the role of central sensitization in the pathophysiology of trigger points is fundamental to developing optimal strategies in the management of myofascial pain syndrome.
本研究旨在探讨中枢敏化是否会引起触发点压痛敏度的节段性增加。我们在 C5 节段诱导中枢敏化,并通过机械性皮肤敏感(刷触诱发痛)检测来验证其存在。触发点压痛敏度用压痛阈(PPT)值来量化。右侧肘外侧 C5 皮区用 45°C 热预处理 10 分钟。然后,试验组(n=20)在 C5 皮区给予辣椒素乳膏(0.075%;Medicis,多伦多,加拿大),而对照组(n=20)给予局部安慰剂乳膏(Biotherm Massage,蒙特利尔,加拿大)。在干预后 0(预处理)、10、20 和 30 分钟时,分别从冈下肌(C5,6)和臀中肌(L4,5,S1)触发点记录 PPT 值;所有 PPT 值均与预处理(基线)值归一化。两个触发点部位的 PPT 值之差代表节段机制对冈下肌部位触发点压痛敏度的直接影响(PPT(节段))。与对照组相比,试验组在应用后 10、20 和 30 分钟时,总触诱发痛评分有统计学意义的增加,且 PPT(节段)有显著降低。这些结果表明,中枢敏化的增加会引起节段相关肌肉的触发点压痛敏度的增加。
肌筋膜疼痛是最常见的肌肉骨骼疼痛形式。肌筋膜触发点在肌筋膜疼痛综合征的临床表现中起着重要作用。阐明中枢敏化在触发点病理生理学中的作用对于制定肌筋膜疼痛综合征的最佳管理策略至关重要。