University of Tennessee, Exercise, Sport, and Leisure Studies, Knoxville, 37996, USA.
Int J Sports Med. 2010 Feb;31(2):101-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1242810. Epub 2009 Dec 21.
We determined the validity of the Nike+ device for estimating speed, distance, and energy expenditure (EE) during walking and running. Twenty trained individuals performed a maximal oxygen uptake test and underwent anthropometric and body composition testing. Each participant was outfitted with a Nike+ sensor inserted into the shoe and an Apple iPod nano. They performed eight 6-min stages on the treadmill, including level walking at 55, 82, and 107 m x min(-1), inclined walking (82 m x min(-1)) at 5 and 10% grades, and level running at 134, 161, and 188 m x min(-1). Speed was measured using a tachometer and EE was measured by indirect calorimetry. Results showed that the Nike+ device overestimated the speed of level walking at 55 m x min(-1) by 20%, underestimated the speed of level walking at 107 m x min(-1) by 12%, but closely estimated the speed of level walking at 82 m x min(-1), and level running at all speeds (p<0.05). Similar results were found for distance. The Nike+ device overestimated the EE of level walking by 18-37%, but closely estimated the EE of level running (p<0.05). In conclusion the Nike+ in-shoe device provided reasonable estimates of speed and distance during level running at the three speeds tested in this study. However, it overestimated EE during level walking and it did not detect the increased cost of inclined locomotion.
我们确定了 Nike+ 设备在估计步行和跑步时的速度、距离和能量消耗 (EE) 的有效性。二十名经过训练的个体进行了最大摄氧量测试,并进行了人体测量和身体成分测试。每位参与者都穿着 Nike+ 传感器插入鞋中,并配备了苹果 iPod nano。他们在跑步机上进行了八次 6 分钟的阶段,包括水平行走 55、82 和 107 m x min(-1),倾斜行走(82 m x min(-1))在 5%和 10%的坡度上,以及水平跑步 134、161 和 188 m x min(-1)。速度通过转速计测量,EE 通过间接测热法测量。结果表明,Nike+ 设备高估了 55 m x min(-1)的水平行走速度,低估了 107 m x min(-1)的水平行走速度,而水平行走的速度则非常接近,所有速度的水平跑步(p<0.05)。距离也得到了类似的结果。Nike+ 设备高估了水平行走的 EE 18-37%,但非常接近水平跑步的 EE(p<0.05)。总之,在本研究中测试的三种速度下,Nike+ 鞋内设备在水平跑步时提供了合理的速度和距离估计。然而,它高估了水平行走时的 EE,并且没有检测到倾斜运动的增加成本。