Suppr超能文献

华法林、阿司匹林和氯吡格雷在围手术期的持续使用与器械植入后血肿形成发生率之间的关系。

The relationship between warfarin, aspirin, and clopidogrel continuation in the peri-procedural period and the incidence of hematoma formation after device implantation.

作者信息

Thal Sergio, Moukabary Talal, Boyella Ravichandra, Shanmugasundaram Madhan, Pierce Mary K, Thai Hoang, Goldman Steven

机构信息

From the Southern Arizona VA Health Care System and Sarver Heart Center at University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2010 Apr;33(4):385-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02674.x. Epub 2010 Jan 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many patients requiring permanent pacemaker (PPM) or implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) placement are anticoagulated with warfarin, aspirin (ASA), and clopidogrel for a number of thromboembolic risk indications. The present review sought to evaluate the relationship between continuation of these medications in the peri-procedural period and the incidence of hematoma formation after implantation.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients undergoing PPM and ICD implantation at our hospital from January 2007-2009. All patients on warfarin, aspirin, and clopidogrel were maintained on these medications peri-operatively. We collected data on the use of warfarin at implantation, INR prior to device implantation, use of dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), such as concomitant aspirin and clopidogrel and subsequent formation of hematoma in the peri-procedure period.

RESULTS

PPM and ICD implantations were performed in 194 men and six women. The mean age was 73 years old. Fifty eight patients were taking warfarin with an average international normalized ratio of 1.9 +/- 0.6; 112 were on ASA, 23 on clopidogrel, and 20 of them on DAPT. Only five patients were on DAPT and warfarin combined at the time of device implantation. Hematomas formed in a total of seven patients (3.5%), five of whom were on DAPT consisting of ASA and clopidogrel (P < 0.0001) while only two of them were on warfarin (P = 0.67). Pocket revision for hematoma evacuation was needed in four patients (2%), three of whom were on DAPT and only one on warfarin.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that hematoma formation after PPM or ICD implantation is rare, even among those who are anticoagulated. There were more patients with hematoma on DAPT than warfarin therapy and half of these patients with this complication needed pocket revision for evacuation. (PACE 2010; 385-388).

摘要

背景

许多需要植入永久性起搏器(PPM)或植入式心脏除颤器(ICD)的患者因多种血栓栓塞风险指征而接受华法林、阿司匹林(ASA)和氯吡格雷抗凝治疗。本综述旨在评估围手术期继续使用这些药物与植入后血肿形成发生率之间的关系。

方法

我们回顾性分析了2007年1月至2009年在我院接受PPM和ICD植入的连续患者。所有服用华法林、阿司匹林和氯吡格雷的患者在围手术期均维持使用这些药物。我们收集了植入时华法林的使用情况、设备植入前的国际标准化比值(INR)、双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)的使用情况,如同时使用阿司匹林和氯吡格雷,以及围手术期随后血肿形成的数据。

结果

共对194名男性和6名女性进行了PPM和ICD植入。平均年龄为73岁。58名患者服用华法林,平均国际标准化比值为1.9±0.6;112名患者服用ASA,23名患者服用氯吡格雷,其中20名患者接受DAPT治疗。在设备植入时,只有5名患者同时服用DAPT和华法林。共有7名患者(3.5%)形成血肿,其中5名患者接受由ASA和氯吡格雷组成的DAPT治疗(P<0.0001),而只有2名患者服用华法林(P = 0.67)。4名患者(2%)需要进行血肿清除的囊袋修复,其中3名患者接受DAPT治疗,只有1名患者服用华法林。

结论

本研究表明,即使在接受抗凝治疗的患者中,PPM或ICD植入后血肿形成也很少见。接受DAPT治疗的患者发生血肿的人数多于接受华法林治疗的患者,并且这些并发症患者中有一半需要进行囊袋修复以清除血肿。(《心律》2010年;385 - 388页)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验