Center of Cancer Systems Biology, Dept. of Medicine, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02135, USA.
Drug Resist Updat. 2010 Feb-Apr;13(1-2):16-28. doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2009.12.001. Epub 2010 Jan 12.
Within three decades, anti-angiogenic therapy has rapidly evolved into an integral component of current standard anti-cancer treatment. Anti-angiogenic therapy has fulfilled a number of its earlier proposed promises. The universality of this approach is demonstrated by the broad spectrum of malignant and benign tumor entities, as well as non-neoplastic diseases, that are currently treated with anti-angiogenic agents. In contrast to tumor cell targeting therapies, the development of acquired drug resistance (e.g., via mutations in growth factor receptor signaling genes) has not been described yet for the principal target of anti-angiogenic therapy--the tumor endothelium. Moreover, the tumor endothelium has emerged as a critical target of conventional cancer therapies, such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The presumption that tumor growth and metastasis are angiogenesis-dependent implies that the number of potential targets of an anti-cancer therapy could be reduced to those that stimulate the angiogenesis process. Therefore, the set of endogenous angiogenesis stimulants might constitute an "Achilles heel" of cancer. Direct targeting of tumor endothelium via, e.g., endogenous angiogenesis inhibitors poses another promising but clinically less explored therapeutic strategy. Indeed, the majority of current anti-angiogenic approaches block the activity of a single or at most a few pro-angiogenic proteins secreted by tumor cells or the tumor stroma. Based on our systems biology work on the angiogenic switch, we predicted that the redundancy of angiogenic signals might limit the efficacy of anti-angiogenic monotherapies. In support of this hypothesis, emerging experimental evidence suggests that tumors may become refractory or even evade the inhibition of a single pro-angiogenic pathway via compensatory upregulation of alternative angiogenic factors. Here, we discuss current concepts and propose novel strategies to overcome tumor evasion of anti-angiogenic therapy. We believe that early detection of tumors, prediction of tumor evasive mechanisms and rational design of anti-angiogenic combinations will direct anti-angiogenic therapy towards its ultimate goal--the conversion of cancer to a dormant, chronic, manageable disease.
在三十年内,抗血管生成治疗迅速发展成为当前癌症标准治疗的一个组成部分。抗血管生成治疗已经实现了其早期提出的许多承诺。这种方法的普遍性体现在广泛的恶性和良性肿瘤实体,以及非肿瘤性疾病,目前都用抗血管生成剂治疗。与肿瘤细胞靶向治疗不同,尚未描述抗血管生成治疗的主要靶点——肿瘤内皮细胞的获得性药物耐药性(例如,通过生长因子受体信号基因的突变)的发展。此外,肿瘤内皮细胞已成为传统癌症治疗方法(如化疗和放疗)的关键靶点。肿瘤生长和转移依赖于血管生成的假设意味着抗癌治疗的潜在靶点数量可以减少到那些刺激血管生成过程的靶点。因此,内源性血管生成刺激物的集合可能构成癌症的“阿喀琉斯之踵”。通过内源性血管生成抑制剂直接靶向肿瘤内皮细胞是另一种有前途但临床研究较少的治疗策略。事实上,目前大多数抗血管生成方法都阻断了肿瘤细胞或肿瘤基质分泌的单一或最多几种促血管生成蛋白的活性。基于我们对血管生成开关的系统生物学研究,我们预测血管生成信号的冗余可能限制抗血管生成单药治疗的疗效。支持这一假设的是,新出现的实验证据表明,肿瘤可能通过替代血管生成因子的代偿性上调而对单一促血管生成途径的抑制产生耐药性,甚至逃避。在这里,我们讨论当前的概念,并提出克服肿瘤逃避抗血管生成治疗的新策略。我们相信,肿瘤的早期检测、肿瘤逃避机制的预测和抗血管生成联合治疗的合理设计将使抗血管生成治疗朝着最终目标——将癌症转化为休眠、慢性、可管理的疾病的方向发展。