MSc, Johns Hopkins University, Johns Hopkins Children's Center, CMSC 1-141, 600 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Pediatrics. 2010 Feb;125(2):206-13. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-1382. Epub 2010 Jan 11.
Despite the magnitude of the problem of catheter-associated bloodstream infections (CA-BSIs) in children, relatively little research has been performed to identify effective strategies to reduce these complications. In this study, we aimed to develop and evaluate effective catheter-care practices to reduce pediatric CA-BSIs.
Our study was a multi-institutional, interrupted time-series design with historical control data and was conducted in 29 PICUs across the United States. Two central venous catheter-care practice bundles comprised our intervention: the insertion bundle of pediatric-tailored care elements derived from adult efforts and the maintenance bundle derived from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations and expert pediatric clinician consensus. The bundles were deployed with quality-improvement teaching and methods to support their adoption by teams at the participating PICUs. The main outcome measures were the rate of CA-BSIs from January 2004 to September 2007 and compliance with each element of the insertion and maintenance bundles from October 2006 to September 2007.
Average CA-BSI rates were reduced by 43% across 29 PICUs (5.4 vs 3.1 CA-BSIs per 1000 central-line-days; P < .0001). By September 2007, insertion-bundle compliance was 84% and maintenance-bundle compliance was 82%. Hierarchical regression modeling showed that the only significant predictor of an observed decrease in infection rates was the collective use of the insertion and maintenance bundles, as demonstrated by the relative rate (RR) and confidence intervals (CIs) (RR: 0.57 [95% CI: 0.45-0.74]; P < .0001). We used comparable modeling to assess the relative importance of the insertion versus maintenance bundles; the results showed that the only significant predictor of an infection-rate decrease was maintenance-bundle compliance (RR: 0.41 [95% CI: 0.20-0.85]; P = .017).
In contrast with adult ICU care, maximizing insertion-bundle compliance alone cannot help PICUs to eliminate CA-BSIs. The main drivers for additional reductions in pediatric CA-BSI rates are issues that surround daily maintenance care for central lines, as defined in our maintenance bundle. Additional research is needed to define the optimal maintenance bundle that will facilitate elimination of CA-BSIs for children.
尽管儿童中心静脉导管相关血流感染(CA-BSI)问题严重,但相对而言,针对减少此类并发症的有效策略,研究较少。本研究旨在制定并评估有效的导管护理实践,以降低儿科 CA-BSI。
本研究采用多机构、中断时间序列设计,具有历史对照数据,在美国 29 个 PICUs 中进行。我们的干预措施包括两个中心静脉导管护理实践包:源自成人努力的儿科专用护理元素的插入包和源自疾病预防控制中心建议和专家儿科临床医生共识的维护包。这些包通过质量改进教学和方法进行部署,以支持参与 PICUs 的团队采用。主要结果指标为 2004 年 1 月至 2007 年 9 月期间的 CA-BSI 发生率以及 2006 年 10 月至 2007 年 9 月期间插入和维护包各元素的依从性。
29 个 PICUs 的 CA-BSI 发生率平均降低了 43%(每千个中心静脉置管日 5.4 例与 3.1 例 CA-BSI;P <.0001)。到 2007 年 9 月,插入包的依从率为 84%,维护包的依从率为 82%。分层回归模型显示,唯一显著预测感染率下降的因素是插入和维护包的集体使用,这表现为相对率(RR)和置信区间(CI)(RR:0.57 [95%CI:0.45-0.74];P <.0001)。我们使用类似的模型来评估插入与维护包的相对重要性;结果表明,唯一显著预测感染率下降的因素是维护包的依从性(RR:0.41 [95%CI:0.20-0.85];P =.017)。
与成人 ICU 护理不同,仅最大限度地提高插入包的依从性并不能帮助 PICUs 消除 CA-BSI。儿科 CA-BSI 发生率进一步降低的主要驱动因素是我们的维护包中定义的中心静脉导管日常维护相关问题。需要进一步研究以确定最佳的维护包,以促进儿童 CA-BSI 的消除。