Department for Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
BMC Infect Dis. 2010 Jan 12;10:8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-10-8.
Influenza immunisation for healthcare workers is encouraged to protect their often vulnerable patients but also due to a perceived higher risk for influenza. We aimed to compare the risk of influenza infection in healthcare workers in acute hospital care with that in non-healthcare workers over the same season.
We conducted a prospective, multicentre cohort study during the 2006/07 influenza season in Berlin, Germany. Recruited participants gave serum samples before and after the season, and completed questionnaires to determine their relevant exposures and possible confounding factors. The main outcome measure was serologically confirmed influenza infection (SCII), defined as a fourfold or greater rise in haemagglutination inhibition antibody titres to a circulating strain of influenza (with post-season titre at least 1:40).Weekly mobile phone text messages were used to prompt participants to report respiratory illnesses during the influenza season. A logistic regression model was used to assess the influence of potential risk factors.
We recruited 250 hospital healthcare workers (mean age 35.7 years) and 486 non-healthcare workers (mean age 39.2 years) from administrative centres, blood donors and colleges.Overall SCII attack rate was 10.6%. Being a healthcare worker was not a risk factor for SCII (relative risk 1.1, p = 0.70). The final multivariate model had three significant factors: living with children (odds ratio [OR] 3.7, p = 0.005), immunization (OR 0.50, p = 0.02), and--among persons living in households without children--ownership of a car (OR 3.0, p = 0.02). Living with three or more children (OR 13.8, p < 0.01) was a greater risk than living with one or two children (OR 5.3, p = 0.02). 30% of participants with SCII reported no respiratory illness. Healthcare workers were at slightly higher risk of reporting any respiratory infection than controls (adjusted OR 1.3, p = 0.04, n = 850).
Our results suggest that healthcare workers in hospitals do not have a higher risk of influenza than non-healthcare workers, although their risk of any respiratory infection is slightly raised. Household contacts seem to be more important than exposure to patients. Car ownership is a surprise finding which needs further exploration. Asymptomatic infections are common, accounting for around a third of serologically confirmed infections.
鼓励医护人员接种流感疫苗,以保护他们经常接触的脆弱患者,同时也因为他们被认为感染流感的风险更高。我们旨在比较同一季节在急性医院护理中的医护人员与非医护人员中流感感染的风险。
我们在德国柏林进行了一项 2006/07 流感季节的前瞻性、多中心队列研究。招募的参与者在季节前后提供血清样本,并完成问卷以确定他们的相关暴露和可能的混杂因素。主要结局测量是血清学确认的流感感染(SCII),定义为血凝抑制抗体滴度对循环流感株的四倍或更高增加(季节后滴度至少为 1:40)。每周使用手机短信提示参与者报告流感季节的呼吸道疾病。使用逻辑回归模型评估潜在危险因素的影响。
我们从行政中心、献血者和学院招募了 250 名医院医护人员(平均年龄 35.7 岁)和 486 名非医护人员(平均年龄 39.2 岁)。总体 SCII 发病率为 10.6%。作为医护人员并不是 SCII 的危险因素(相对风险 1.1,p = 0.70)。最终的多变量模型有三个显著因素:与儿童同住(优势比[OR]3.7,p = 0.005)、免疫接种(OR 0.50,p = 0.02),以及——在没有孩子的家庭中——拥有汽车(OR 3.0,p = 0.02)。与一个或两个孩子同住(OR 5.3,p = 0.02)相比,与三个或更多孩子同住(OR 13.8,p <0.01)的风险更高。30%的 SCII 患者报告没有呼吸道疾病。与对照组相比,医护人员报告任何呼吸道感染的风险略高(调整后的 OR 1.3,p = 0.04,n = 850)。
我们的结果表明,医院的医护人员感染流感的风险并不高于非医护人员,尽管他们任何呼吸道感染的风险略高。家庭接触似乎比接触患者更重要。拥有汽车是一个令人惊讶的发现,需要进一步探索。无症状感染很常见,约占血清学确认感染的三分之一。