Belda-Sanchís José, Serra-Mitjans Mireia, Iglesias Sentis Manuela, Rami Ramon
Cirugia Torácica, Hospital Universitario Mutua de Terrassa, Plaza Dr. Robert, 5, Terrassa (Barcelona), Spain, 08221.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20;2010(1):CD003051. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003051.pub3.
Postoperative air leak is a frequent complication after pulmonary resection for lung cancer. It may cause serious complications, such as empyema, or prolong the need for chest tube and hospitalization. Different types of surgical sealants have been developed to prevent or to reduce postoperative air leaks. A systematic review was therefore undertaken to evaluate the evidence on their effectiveness.
To evaluate the effectiveness of surgical sealants in preventing or reducing postoperative air leaks after pulmonary resection for lung cancer.
We searched the electronic databases MEDLINE (1966 to September 2008), EMBASE (1974 to September 2008), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL)(The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2008) and listed references. We hand searched conference proceedings to identify published and unpublished trials.
We included randomized controlled clinical trials in which standard closure techniques plus a sealant were compared with the same intervention with no use of any sealant in patients undergoing elective pulmonary resection provided that a large proportion of the patients studied had undergone pulmonary resection for lung cancer.
Four reviewers independently selected the trials to be included in the review, assessed methodological quality of each trial and extracted data using a standardized form. Because of several limitations, narrative synthesis was used at this stage.
Sixteen trials, with 1642 randomized patients in total were included. In thirteen trials there were differences between treatment and control patients in reducing postoperative air leaks. This reduction proved to be significant in six trials. Three trials showed a significant reduction in time to chest drain removal in the treatment group. In two trials, the percentage of patients with persistent air leak was significantly smaller in the treatment group. Finally, three trials including 352 patients showed a statistically significant reduction in length of hospital stay.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Surgical sealants reduce postoperative air leaks and time to chest drain removal but this reduction is not always associated with a reduction in length of postoperative hospital stay. Therefore, systematic use of surgical sealants with the objective of reducing hospital stay cannot be recommended at the moment. More and larger randomized controlled clinical trials are needed.
术后漏气是肺癌肺切除术后常见的并发症。它可能导致严重的并发症,如脓胸,或延长胸管留置时间和住院时间。已研发出不同类型的手术密封剂来预防或减少术后漏气。因此,进行了一项系统评价以评估其有效性的证据。
评估手术密封剂在预防或减少肺癌肺切除术后漏气方面的有效性。
我们检索了电子数据库MEDLINE(1966年至2008年9月)、EMBASE(1974年至2008年9月)以及Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)(《Cochrane图书馆》,2008年第3期)并列出参考文献。我们手工检索会议论文集以识别已发表和未发表的试验。
我们纳入了随机对照临床试验,其中将标准闭合技术加密封剂与在接受择期肺切除的患者中不使用任何密封剂的相同干预措施进行比较,前提是大部分研究患者接受了肺癌肺切除术。
四位评价者独立选择纳入评价的试验,评估每个试验的方法学质量,并使用标准化表格提取数据。由于存在一些局限性,在此阶段采用叙述性综合分析。
共纳入16项试验,总计1642例随机分组患者。在13项试验中,治疗组和对照组患者在减少术后漏气方面存在差异。在6项试验中,这种减少被证明具有统计学意义。3项试验显示治疗组胸管拔除时间显著缩短。在2项试验中,治疗组持续漏气患者的百分比显著降低。最后,3项包括352例患者的试验显示住院时间有统计学意义的缩短。
手术密封剂可减少术后漏气和胸管拔除时间,但这种减少并不总是与术后住院时间的缩短相关。因此,目前不建议为减少住院时间而系统性使用手术密封剂。需要更多且规模更大的随机对照临床试验。