Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Altanta, Georgia 30308, USA.
Breast J. 2010 Mar-Apr;16(2):141-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2009.00891.x. Epub 2009 Jan 19.
The application of oncoplastic techniques to breast conservation therapy (BCT) is thought to improve cosmetic results with some documented oncologic advantages in certain patients. Although present data highlight the oncologic safety of this approach, the role of oncoplastic surgery specific to ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has not been elucidated. In this study, all women in the Emory Healthcare system between January 1991 and June 2006 with biopsy-proven DCIS who underwent lumpectomies combined with simultaneous reduction mammaplasties or mastopexies were identified. Medical records, including office notes, operative and pathology reports were analyzed. Parameters included age, BMI, histologic grade (low, intermediate, high) and type (comedo versus non-comedo) of DCIS, margin status, locoregional recurrence, specimen weight, postoperative complications, and overall outcomes. Pedicle design and contralateral breast pathology were also analyzed. Twenty-eight women were included in the study with an average age of 47. Therapeutic mammaplasty was the definitive procedure for 18 (64%) of these patients. Ten patients (36%) required reoperations: nine for positive margins and one for residual microcalcifications (stereo biopsy DCIS). Overall, seven patients (25%) required completion mastectomy with reconstruction (transverse rectus abdominus myocutaneous flap: n = 3, latissimus flap: n = 4), whereas three patients (11%) underwent re-excisions with confirmation of negative margins. All ten women who required completion mastectomy or re-excisions exhibited either intermediate or high-grade, comedo DCIS. Overall, 50% (6/12) of women diagnosed with high-grade comedo DCIS required completion mastectomy with reconstruction after initial therapeutic mammaplasty. The final positive-margin rate for women diagnosed with intermediate-grade, comedo necrosis was 43% (3/7). The women in this failed group that required reoperations were overall younger (mean: 45.6; median: 43) than those in which oncoplastic surgery was the definitive procedure (mean: 57.8; median: 57). There were no significant differences between the failed and successful groups in terms of biopsy weight (failed: 253 g, successful: 237 g), type of excision (e.g., wire-localized), location of tumor, reduction type (e.g., superior medial), or postoperative complications. There was one case of locoregional recurrence of DCIS 7 months after the initial operation. All 28 patients had no evidence of disease at an average follow-up of 2.7 years. This study suggests that although oncoplastic reduction techniques are a reasonable approach for women with DCIS, stricter patient selection and improved confirmation of negative margins will minimize the need for either re-excisions or completion mastectomy and reconstruction.
保乳治疗(BCT)中应用肿瘤整形技术被认为可以改善美容效果,并在某些患者中具有一定的肿瘤学优势。尽管目前的数据强调了这种方法的肿瘤安全性,但特定于导管原位癌(DCIS)的肿瘤整形手术的作用尚未阐明。在这项研究中,我们确定了 1991 年 1 月至 2006 年 6 月期间在埃默里医疗保健系统中接受活检证实的 DCIS 并接受肿块切除术联合同时进行的乳房缩小成形术或乳房悬吊术的所有女性。分析了病历,包括办公室记录、手术和病理报告。参数包括年龄、BMI、组织学分级(低、中、高)和类型(粉刺型与非粉刺型)、切缘状态、局部区域复发、标本重量、术后并发症和总体结果。还分析了蒂的设计和对侧乳房的病理情况。本研究共纳入 28 例患者,平均年龄为 47 岁。治疗性乳房缩小术是这些患者中 18 例(64%)的最终治疗方法。10 例患者(36%)需要再次手术:9 例为阳性切缘,1 例为残留微钙化(立体定向活检 DCIS)。总体而言,7 例患者(25%)需要完成乳房切除术和重建(横向腹直肌肌皮瓣:n = 3,背阔肌皮瓣:n = 4),而 3 例患者(11%)进行了再次切除并证实为阴性切缘。所有需要完成乳房切除术或再次切除的 10 例女性均表现为中高级别、粉刺型 DCIS。总体而言,50%(6/12)最初接受治疗性乳房缩小术的高级别粉刺型 DCIS 女性需要完成乳房切除术和重建。组织学分级为中等级别、粉刺样坏死的女性中,最终阳性切缘率为 43%(3/7)。在需要再次手术的失败组中,女性的总体年龄(平均值:45.6;中位数:43)低于最终采用肿瘤整形术的女性(平均值:57.8;中位数:57)。在活检重量(失败:253 g,成功:237 g)、切除类型(如,线定位)、肿瘤位置、缩小类型(如,上内侧)或术后并发症方面,失败组和成功组之间没有显著差异。有 1 例 DCIS 局部区域复发发生在初始手术后 7 个月。所有 28 例患者的平均随访 2.7 年后均无疾病证据。本研究表明,尽管肿瘤整形缩小技术是 DCIS 女性的合理治疗方法,但更严格的患者选择和更准确的阴性切缘确认将最大限度地减少再次切除或完成乳房切除术和重建的需要。