Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Am J Cardiol. 2010 Feb 1;105(3):411-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.09.050. Epub 2009 Dec 22.
Although the benefit of antithrombotic therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) is well recognized, its potential effect on stroke severity and outcome is less well established. Our objective was to examine the effect of preadmission antithrombotic therapy on stroke severity and outcome in patients with AF within a large comprehensive nationwide stroke survey. The data from consecutive patients with AF admitted with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack during a 2-month period were collected. The patients were categorized into 4 groups according to the use of preadmission antithrombotic therapy: no antithrombotic therapy, antiplatelet therapy, warfarin with an admission international normalized ratio (INR) <2 and INR of > or = 2. Of 1,938 patients presenting with acute brain ischemia, 329 (17%) had AF. The age-adjusted rate of more severe stroke (baseline National Institutes of Health stroke scale score >5) stratified by antithrombotic therapy use was 70% for no antithrombotic therapy use, 55% for antiplatelet therapy use, 59% for warfarin with an INR <2, and 38% for warfarin with an INR of > or = 2 (p = 0.01). Compared to warfarin therapy with an admission INR of > or = 2, the adjusted odds ratio for more severe strokes was 4.0 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7 to 10.0) for no antithrombotic therapy, 2.2 (95% CI 1.0 to 9.4) for antiplatelet therapy, and 2.7 (95% CI 1.1 to 6.7) for warfarin therapy with an INR of <2. Similarly, graded associations of antithrombotic medication were observed with severe disability (modified Rankin Scale score >3) or death at discharge, with corresponding adjusted odds ratios of 4.1 (95% CI 1.8 to 9.9), 2.1 (95% CI 1.0 to 4.6), and 1.5 (95% CI 0.6 to 3.5), and 1-year mortality, with corresponding adjusted ORs of 2.4 (95% CI 0.9 to 6.7), 1.9 (95% CI 0.8 to 5.0), and 2.2 (95% CI 0.8 to 6.2). In conclusion, in addition to its established benefit for stroke prevention, effective anticoagulation therapy is associated with decreased stroke severity and better functional outcome and survival in patients with AF presenting with acute brain ischemia.
尽管抗血栓治疗预防心房颤动(AF)卒中的益处已得到广泛认可,但它对卒中严重程度和结局的潜在影响尚未得到充分证实。我们的目的是在一项大型综合性全国性卒中调查中,研究入院前抗血栓治疗对 AF 患者卒中严重程度和结局的影响。连续收集了 2 个月内因急性缺血性卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作而入院的 AF 患者的数据。根据入院前抗血栓治疗的使用情况,将患者分为 4 组:无抗血栓治疗、抗血小板治疗、INR<2 的华法林和 INR≥2 的华法林。在 1938 例急性脑缺血患者中,329 例(17%)有 AF。按抗血栓治疗使用情况分层,无抗血栓治疗、抗血小板治疗、INR<2 的华法林和 INR≥2 的华法林的严重卒中(基线 NIHSS 评分>5)的年龄校正发生率分别为 70%、55%、59%和 38%(p=0.01)。与 INR≥2 的华法林治疗相比,无抗血栓治疗、抗血小板治疗和 INR<2 的华法林治疗的严重卒中调整后比值比(OR)分别为 4.0(95%置信区间[CI]1.7 至 10.0)、2.2(95%CI1.0 至 9.4)和 2.7(95%CI1.1 至 6.7)。同样,抗血栓药物的分级关联也与严重残疾(改良 Rankin 量表评分>3)或出院时死亡有关,相应的调整后 OR 分别为 4.1(95%CI1.8 至 9.9)、2.1(95%CI1.0 至 4.6)和 1.5(95%CI0.6 至 3.5),1 年死亡率的相应调整后 OR 分别为 2.4(95%CI0.9 至 6.7)、1.9(95%CI0.8 至 5.0)和 2.2(95%CI0.8 至 6.2)。总之,除了对卒中预防的明确益处外,有效的抗凝治疗与 AF 患者急性脑缺血后卒中严重程度降低、功能结局和生存率改善相关。