Behr James, Friedly Janna, Molton Ivan, Morgenroth David, Jensen Mark P, Smith Douglas G
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, 1959 NE Pacific St, Box 356490, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2009;46(7):963-72. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2008.07.0085.
Pain and pain-related interference with physical function have not been thoroughly studied in individuals who have undergone knee-disarticulation amputations. The principal aim of this study was to determine whether individuals with knee-disarticulation amputations have worse pain and pain-related interference with physical function than do individuals with transtibial or transfemoral amputations. We analyzed cross-sectional survey data provided by 42 adults with lower-limb amputations. These individuals consisted of 14 adults reporting knee-disarticulation amputation in one limb and best-matched cases (14 reporting transfemoral amputation and 14 reporting transtibial amputation) from a larger cross-sectional sample of 472 individuals. Participants were rigorously matched based on time since amputation, reason for amputation, age, sex, diabetes diagnosis, and pain before amputation. Continuous outcome variables were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance. Categorical outcomes were analyzed by Pearson chi-square statistic. Given the relatively small sample size and power concerns, mean differences were also described by estimated effect size (Cohen's d). Of the 42 participants, 83% were male. They ranged in age from 36 to 85 (median = 55.1, standard deviation = 11.0). Most amputations were of traumatic origin (74%), and participants were on average 12.4 years from their amputations at the time of the survey. Individuals with transtibial amputation reported significantly more prosthesis use than did individuals with knee-disarticulation amputation. Amputation levels did not significantly differ in phantom limb pain, residual limb pain, back pain, and pain-related interference with physical function. Estimates of effect size, however, indicated that participants with knee-disarticulation amputation reported less phantom limb pain, phantom limb pain-related interference with physical function, residual limb pain, residual limb pain-related interference with physical function, and back pain-related interference with physical function than did participants with transtibial or transfemoral amputations. This study demonstrated that patients with knee-disarticulation amputation used prostheses significantly less than did patients with transtibial amputation. However, no evidence was found that patients with knee-disarticulation amputation have worse outcomes in terms of pain and pain-related interference with physical function; in fact, they may have more favorable long-term outcomes.
在接受膝关节离断截肢手术的个体中,疼痛以及与疼痛相关的对身体功能的干扰尚未得到充分研究。本研究的主要目的是确定膝关节离断截肢患者与经胫骨截肢或经股骨截肢患者相比,是否存在更严重的疼痛以及与疼痛相关的对身体功能的干扰。我们分析了42名下肢截肢成年人提供的横断面调查数据。这些个体包括14名单侧膝关节离断截肢的成年人,以及从472名个体的更大横断面样本中挑选出的最佳匹配病例(14名经股骨截肢者和14名经胫骨截肢者)。根据截肢后的时间、截肢原因、年龄、性别、糖尿病诊断以及截肢前的疼痛情况对参与者进行了严格匹配。连续结果变量通过单因素方差分析进行分析。分类结果通过Pearson卡方统计量进行分析。鉴于样本量相对较小以及对检验效能的担忧,平均差异也通过估计效应量(Cohen's d)进行描述。在42名参与者中,83%为男性。他们的年龄在36岁至85岁之间(中位数 = 55.1,标准差 = 11.0)。大多数截肢是由创伤引起的(74%),在调查时,参与者截肢的平均时间为12.4年。经胫骨截肢的个体报告使用假肢的频率明显高于膝关节离断截肢的个体。在幻肢痛、残肢痛、背痛以及与疼痛相关的对身体功能的干扰方面,截肢水平没有显著差异。然而,效应量估计表明,与经胫骨或经股骨截肢的参与者相比,膝关节离断截肢的参与者报告的幻肢痛、与幻肢痛相关的对身体功能的干扰、残肢痛、与残肢痛相关的对身体功能的干扰以及与背痛相关的对身体功能的干扰更少。本研究表明,膝关节离断截肢患者使用假肢的频率明显低于经胫骨截肢患者。然而,没有证据表明膝关节离断截肢患者在疼痛以及与疼痛相关的对身体功能的干扰方面有更差的结果;事实上,他们可能有更有利的长期结果。