Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2010 Feb 1;5(2):e8975. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008975.
Human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) generated by de-differentiation of adult somatic cells offer potential solutions for the ethical issues surrounding human embryonic stem cells (hESCs), as well as their immunologic rejection after cellular transplantation. However, although hiPSCs have been described as "embryonic stem cell-like", these cells have a distinct gene expression pattern compared to hESCs, making incomplete reprogramming a potential pitfall. It is unclear to what degree the difference in tissue of origin may contribute to these gene expression differences. To answer these important questions, a careful transcriptional profiling analysis is necessary to investigate the exact reprogramming state of hiPSCs, as well as analysis of the impression, if any, of the tissue of origin on the resulting hiPSCs. In this study, we compare the gene profiles of hiPSCs derived from fetal fibroblasts, neonatal fibroblasts, adipose stem cells, and keratinocytes to their corresponding donor cells and hESCs. Our analysis elucidates the overall degree of reprogramming within each hiPSC line, as well as the "distance" between each hiPSC line and its donor cell. We further identify genes that have a similar mode of regulation in hiPSCs and their corresponding donor cells compared to hESCs, allowing us to specify core sets of donor genes that continue to be expressed in each hiPSC line. We report that residual gene expression of the donor cell type contributes significantly to the differences among hiPSCs and hESCs, and adds to the incompleteness in reprogramming. Specifically, our analysis reveals that fetal fibroblast-derived hiPSCs are closer to hESCs, followed by adipose, neonatal fibroblast, and keratinocyte-derived hiPSCs.
人类诱导多能干细胞(hiPSCs)由成人体细胞去分化产生,为解决人类胚胎干细胞(hESCs)所带来的伦理问题以及细胞移植后的免疫排斥问题提供了潜在的解决方案。然而,尽管 hiPSCs 被描述为“胚胎干细胞样”,但与 hESCs 相比,这些细胞具有独特的基因表达模式,使得不完全重编程成为一个潜在的陷阱。目前尚不清楚组织起源的差异在多大程度上导致了这些基因表达的差异。为了回答这些重要问题,需要进行仔细的转录谱分析,以研究 hiPSCs 的精确重编程状态,以及分析组织起源对产生的 hiPSCs 的影响(如果有的话)。在这项研究中,我们比较了源自胎儿成纤维细胞、新生儿成纤维细胞、脂肪干细胞和角质形成细胞的 hiPSCs 与其相应供体细胞和 hESCs 的基因谱。我们的分析阐明了每个 hiPSC 系内整体重编程的程度,以及每个 hiPSC 系与其供体细胞之间的“距离”。我们进一步鉴定了在 hiPSCs 及其相应供体细胞中与 hESCs 相比具有相似调控模式的基因,使我们能够指定在每个 hiPSC 系中继续表达的核心供体基因集。我们报告说,供体细胞类型的残留基因表达对 hiPSCs 和 hESCs 之间的差异有显著贡献,并增加了重编程的不完整性。具体而言,我们的分析表明,源自胎儿成纤维细胞的 hiPSCs 与 hESCs 更为接近,其次是脂肪细胞、新生儿成纤维细胞和角质形成细胞衍生的 hiPSCs。