Kovalaske Michelle A, Gandhi Gunjan Y
Mayo Clinic Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Jacksonville, Florida 32224, USA.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009 Nov 1;3(6):1330-41. doi: 10.1177/193229680900300613.
Hyperglycemia in the critically ill is a well-known phenomenon, even in those without known diabetes. The stress response is due to a complex interplay between counter-regulatory hormones, cytokines, and changes in insulin sensitivity. Illness/infection, overfeeding, medications (e.g., corticosteroids), insufficient insulin, and/or volume depletion can be additional contributors. Acute hyperglycemia can adversely affect fluid balance (through glycosuria and dehydration), immune and endothelial function, inflammation, and outcome. While there are several insulin infusion protocols that are able to safely and effectively treat hyperglycemia, the bulk of accumulated evidence does not support a causal relationship between acute hyperglycemia and adverse outcomes in the medical intensive care unit. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials suggests there is no benefit to tightening glucose control to normal levels compared to a reasonable and achievable goal of 140 to 180 mg/dl. There is a significantly increased risk of hypoglycemia. Although there is some evidence that patients without known diabetes have worse outcomes than those with known diabetes, more recent evidence is conflicting. Glycemic control in critically ill patients should not be neglected, as studies have not tested tight versus no/poor control, but tight versus good control. A moderate approach to managing critical illness hyperglycemia seems most prudent at this juncture. Future research should ascertain whether there are certain subgroups of patients that would benefit from tighter glycemic goals. It also remains to be seen if tight glucose control is beneficial once hypoglycemia is minimized with technological advances such as continuous glucose monitoring systems.
危重症患者出现高血糖是一种众所周知的现象,即使在那些无已知糖尿病的患者中也是如此。应激反应是由对抗调节激素、细胞因子以及胰岛素敏感性变化之间复杂的相互作用引起的。疾病/感染、过度喂养、药物(如皮质类固醇)、胰岛素不足和/或容量耗竭可能是其他促成因素。急性高血糖可对液体平衡(通过糖尿和脱水)、免疫和内皮功能、炎症及预后产生不利影响。虽然有几种胰岛素输注方案能够安全有效地治疗高血糖,但大量累积证据并不支持在医学重症监护病房中急性高血糖与不良结局之间存在因果关系。随机对照试验的荟萃分析表明,与将血糖控制在140至180mg/dl这一合理且可实现的目标相比,将血糖严格控制至正常水平并无益处。低血糖风险显著增加。尽管有一些证据表明无已知糖尿病的患者比有已知糖尿病的患者预后更差,但最近的证据存在矛盾。危重症患者的血糖控制不应被忽视,因为研究尚未测试严格控制与不控制/控制不佳的情况,而是严格控制与良好控制的情况。在目前这个阶段,采取适度的方法来管理危重症患者的高血糖似乎最为审慎。未来的研究应确定是否有某些患者亚组会从更严格的血糖目标中获益。随着诸如连续血糖监测系统等技术进步使低血糖风险降至最低后,严格的血糖控制是否有益也有待观察。