Suppr超能文献

语义加工对记忆编码的差异影响。

Differential effects of semantic processing on memory encoding.

机构信息

Department of Epileptology, University of Bonn Medical Center, Bonn, Germany.

出版信息

Hum Brain Mapp. 2010 Nov;31(11):1653-64. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20969.

Abstract

Deeper semantic processing of words leads to enhanced memory encoding (depth of processing effect). The left inferior prefrontal cortex (LIPC) and the left hippocampus are known to be involved in this effect. We tested the hypothesis that different semantic encoding processes contribute qualitatively differently to memory encoding. In a memory experiment using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we compared three different encoding tasks: a nonsemantic alphabetical, an animacy decision, and a size comparison tasks. Recognition memory was tested subsequently. We hypothesized that the size comparison task would activate brain areas involved in the processing of object features and that this would be associated with successful memory encoding. Results showed that the size comparison task led to significantly better memory encoding than the two other tasks. As with the animacy decision task, it led to stronger activation of the LIPC and left hippocampus than the nonsemantic task. Both regions also had stronger activations for later remembered than for nonremembered words. The size comparison task additionally led to stronger activation in the left anterior fusiform gyrus, which was also associated with successful memory encoding. We conclude that different types of semantic processing affect memory encoding based on distinguishable brain processes.

摘要

单词的深层次语义处理会增强记忆编码(加工深度效应)。已知左额下回(LIPC)和左海马体参与了这一效应。我们测试了这样一个假设,即不同的语义编码过程对记忆编码的贡献在质量上有所不同。在一项使用功能磁共振成像的记忆实验中,我们比较了三种不同的编码任务:非语义字母、生动性判断和大小比较任务。随后测试了识别记忆。我们假设大小比较任务会激活与物体特征处理相关的大脑区域,这与成功的记忆编码有关。结果表明,大小比较任务比其他两个任务导致更好的记忆编码。与生动性判断任务一样,它比非语义任务引起 LIPC 和左海马体更强的激活。这两个区域对于后来记住的单词比未记住的单词也有更强的激活。大小比较任务还会引起左侧额下回前回更强的激活,这也与成功的记忆编码有关。我们的结论是,不同类型的语义处理会根据可区分的大脑过程影响记忆编码。

相似文献

4
The effect of word concreteness on recognition memory.词汇具体性对识别记忆的影响。
Neuroimage. 2006 Sep;32(3):1413-21. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.007. Epub 2006 Jul 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Affective and Semantic Valence Among Women.女性情感与语义效价的时空动态
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Jul 13;15:602192. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.602192. eCollection 2021.
3
Depth of Processing and Age Differences.加工深度与年龄差异
J Psycholinguist Res. 2016 Oct;45(5):1137-49. doi: 10.1007/s10936-015-9395-x.
7
Cortical correlates of self-generation in verbal paired associate learning.言语联想学习中自我生成的皮质相关物。
Brain Res. 2012 Feb 9;1437:104-14. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.12.020. Epub 2011 Dec 16.

本文引用的文献

3
Effects of study task on the neural correlates of source encoding.学习任务对源编码神经关联的影响。
Learn Mem. 2008 May 29;15(6):417-25. doi: 10.1101/lm.878908. Print 2008 Jun.
5
Material-specific memory processing is related to language dominance.材料特异性记忆加工与语言优势有关。
Neuroimage. 2007 Aug 15;37(2):611-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.05.022. Epub 2007 May 24.
6
Cerebellar contributions to episodic memory encoding as revealed by fMRI.功能磁共振成像揭示的小脑对情景记忆编码的贡献
Neuroimage. 2007 Apr 15;35(3):1330-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.02.004. Epub 2007 Feb 13.
7
The effect of word concreteness on recognition memory.词汇具体性对识别记忆的影响。
Neuroimage. 2006 Sep;32(3):1413-21. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.007. Epub 2006 Jul 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验