Graduation Program in Dentistry, Restorative Dentistry Area, Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
J Dent. 2010 Jun;38(6):460-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.02.006. Epub 2010 Mar 1.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the microhardness of dentin subjacent to the bonding interface of composite restorations using fluoride-releasing adhesive systems submitted to pH-cycling regimen associated or not to fluoride therapies.
Thirty human third molars were prepared with class V cavities with dentin cervical margins. The adhesive systems One-Up Bond F Plus (OU), Prime&Bond NT (NT), Clearfil Protect Bond (CF), Optibond Solo Plus (OP) and also the controls [-] Single Bond 2 (SB) and [+] Ketac Molar (KM) were used previously to composite resin restorations. The restorations were sectioned into four slabs and submitted to different storage media for 15 days: distilled water, pH-cycling, pH-cycling associated to NaF 0.05% and associated to NaF 1.23%. The Knoop microhardness test was performed in dentin at 50, 100, 150 and 300 microm from the adhesive interface. Data was analyzed by three-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD test (p<0.05).
KM resulted in significantly higher microhardness when compared to all the adhesive systems at 50 microm, with the exception of OU, that was similar to KM when submitted to pH-cycling alone or associated to 1.23% NaF. Microhardness of dentin was significantly higher with all the tested materials, when pH-cycling was associated to NaF 0.05%, at 50 microm and 100 microm depths. OU resulted in similar dentin hardness at all depths and storage media.
The incorporation of NaF 0.05% fluoride therapy to the cariogenic challenge was capable to recover the original microhardness of dentin at 50 and 100 microm with all the tested materials.
本研究旨在评估在 pH 循环处理联合或不联合氟化物治疗的情况下,使用释放氟的黏结系统对复合树脂修复体黏结界面下方牙本质的微硬度的影响。
30 颗人第三磨牙制备 V 类洞,牙本质颈缘。分别采用 One-Up Bond F Plus(OU)、Prime&Bond NT(NT)、Clearfil Protect Bond(CF)、Optibond Solo Plus(OP)黏结剂和对照组[-]Single Bond 2(SB)和[+]Ketac Molar(KM)进行复合树脂修复。将修复体分为四部分,分别置于蒸馏水、pH 循环、pH 循环联合 0.05%氟化钠、pH 循环联合 1.23%氟化钠 4 种不同的储存介质中,15 天后进行测试。在距黏结界面 50、100、150、300 μm 处进行牙本质的维氏硬度测试。采用三因素方差分析和 Tukey HSD 检验进行数据统计分析(p<0.05)。
在距黏结界面 50 μm 处,KM 与所有黏结剂相比微硬度明显较高,除了 OU,单独 pH 循环或联合 1.23%氟化钠时 OU 与 KM 相似。当 pH 循环联合 0.05%氟化钠时,所有测试材料的牙本质微硬度在 50 μm 和 100 μm 处均明显升高。OU 在所有深度和储存介质中的牙本质硬度相似。
在致龋挑战中联合应用 0.05%氟化钠氟化物治疗可以恢复所有测试材料在 50 μm 和 100 μm 处牙本质的原始微硬度。