San Jose State University, San Jose, CA 95192-0079, USA.
Augment Altern Commun. 2010 Mar;26(1):1-11. doi: 10.3109/07434610903561068.
This study compared the operation of a dynamic-display AAC device in two instructional conditions: corrective feedback (CF) and dual-screen guidance (DSG). In the CF condition prompts/feedback were provided for incorrect responses; the DSG condition used errorless guided instruction only. Twenty-one children with typical development - ten 6-year-olds and 11 7-year-olds - were randomly assigned to one instructional condition and completed five sessions: three learning/testing, one generalization, and one maintenance. The children were required to reproduce visual sentence stimuli on the AAC device. Differences were found in accuracy and efficiency of 6- and 7-year-olds. The 7-year-olds were more accurate and quicker than the 6-year-olds. Differences due to instructional condition were observed for 6-year-olds only. All children generalized and maintained learning.
本研究比较了在两种教学条件下,动态显示型辅助沟通设备的运作情况:纠错反馈(CF)和双屏指导(DSG)。在 CF 条件下,对错误的反应提供提示/反馈;DSG 条件仅使用无错误引导式教学。21 名具有典型发展的儿童 - 10 名 6 岁儿童和 11 名 7 岁儿童 - 被随机分配到一个教学条件,并完成了五个学习/测试阶段:三个学习/测试,一个推广,和一个维持。儿童被要求在 AAC 设备上复制视觉句子刺激。在 6 岁和 7 岁儿童中发现了准确性和效率的差异。7 岁儿童比 6 岁儿童更准确和快速。仅在 6 岁儿童中观察到由于教学条件而产生的差异。所有儿童都进行了推广和保持学习。