Reybrouck Gerald
Emeritus Head of Department of Hospital Hygiene and Infection Control of the University Hospital Leuven, Belgium.
GMS Krankenhhyg Interdiszip. 2007 Sep 13;2(1):Doc08.
The first publication on testing disinfection procedures dates back to 1881 and was compiled by Robert Koch. Although his conclusions were erroneous, we continue to use the "germ carrier test" right up to the present day even if preference is now given to the suspension test first devised by Geppert. Over the years many conceptual milestones had to be reached, and much knowledge and many insights were needed to develop this procedure further to ensure reproducible results. Today, the disinfectant effect is calculated in terms of logarithmic reduction factors for the microbial count: a reduction of 5 log levels has been agreed, i.e. an inactivation kinetics of 99.999%.Of paramount importance was, in particular, the insight that different methods had to be employed to test disinfectants, while doing so not only in the laboratory but also under everyday working conditions. This gave rise to a situation whereby each country developed its own test methods, producing significantly different results. It was only in 1970 that the parties concerned came together so as to reach a uniform solution in Europe. The achievements of the "International Colloquium" were later adopted and continued by the European Standardization Committee (CEN) in a special working group (TS 216). The most important accomplishment of this working group is, no doubt, the insight that it is not a testresult but rather a testsystem that will reveal the truth. The tests carried out in Phase 1 are quantitative suspension tests to elucidate the bactericidal, virucidal, tuberculocidal, fungicidal and sporicidal efficacy. Phase 2 defines the requisite concentration per exposure time. CEN was founded and is sponsored by industry, since the latter needs reliable standards. Time will tell whether this was not perhaps the greatest milestone in the development of test methods. However, the successes scored by CEN are ultimately only the logical consequence of the accomplishments already achieved by the "International Colloquium". In reality, most of the procedures that today have been accepted via TS 216 are based on the activities set in motion by the Colloquium. It is impossible to acknowledge just how pivotal was the role played by both legendary "International Colloquia" in 1970 and 1972 in Hamburg in the development of uniform test procedures.
关于测试消毒程序的首次出版物可追溯到1881年,由罗伯特·科赫编纂。尽管他的结论有误,但即使现在更倾向于采用格佩特首先设计的悬液试验,我们至今仍在使用“带菌者试验”。多年来,必须达成许多概念上的里程碑,还需要大量知识和深刻见解来进一步完善这一程序,以确保结果的可重复性。如今,消毒效果是根据微生物数量的对数减少因子来计算的:已商定减少5个对数级别,即99.999%的灭活动力学。尤其重要的是,人们认识到必须采用不同方法来测试消毒剂,而且不仅要在实验室进行,还要在日常工作条件下进行。这导致每个国家都制定了自己的测试方法,产生了显著不同的结果。直到1970年,相关各方才齐聚一堂,以便在欧洲达成统一的解决方案。“国际研讨会”的成果后来由欧洲标准化委员会(CEN)在一个特别工作组(TS 216)中采纳并延续。这个工作组最重要的成就是认识到揭示真相的不是测试结果,而是测试系统。在第1阶段进行的测试是定量悬液试验,以阐明杀菌、杀病毒、杀结核、杀真菌和杀孢子的功效。第2阶段确定每次暴露时间所需的浓度。CEN由行业创立并得到行业赞助,因为行业需要可靠的标准。时间会证明这是否可能是测试方法发展中最大的里程碑。然而,CEN取得的成功最终只是“国际研讨会”已取得成就的必然结果。实际上,如今通过TS 216被接受的大多数程序都基于研讨会发起的活动。很难承认1970年和1972年在汉堡举行的这两次传奇性“国际研讨会”在统一测试程序的发展中所起的关键作用。