Sookmyung Women's University College of Pharmacy, Seoul 140-742, Republic of Korea.
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2010 Oct 1;878(27):2606-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2010.02.008. Epub 2010 Feb 13.
Biological monitoring is a necessary process for risk assessment of endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs), particularly, bisphenol A (BPA), in breast milk, because its human risks are not clear yet, and infants, who feed on breast milk, are highly susceptible for EDCs. Concerning biological monitoring of BPA, the HPLC/FLD has been widely used before the LC/MS/MS. However, there was no report, which simultaneously evaluated the two methods in real analyses. Therefore, we analyzed BPA with LC/MS/MS and HPLC/FLD in human breast milk and conducted comparison of two methods in analyzed BPA levels. After establishing optimal condition, e.g. linearity, recovery, reproducibility and free BPA system, we analyzed BPA levels in human breast milk samples (N=100). The LOQs were similar in the two methods, i.e. 1.8 and 1.3 ng/mL for the HPLC/FLD and LC/MS/MS assays, respectively. There were strong associations between total BPA levels with the two methods (R(2)=0.40, p<0.01), however, only 11% of them were analyzed as similar levels with 15% CVs. In addition, the detection range of BPA was broader in the HPLC method than the LC/MS/MS method. However, the BPA levels in the HPLC/FLD analysis were lower than those in the LC/MS/MS analysis (p<0.01). Thus, the differences in BPA levels between the two methods may come from mainly over-estimation with the LC/MS/MS method in low BPA samples and some of poor resolution with the HPLC/FLD in high BPA samples.
生物监测是评估内分泌干扰化学物质(EDCs)风险的必要过程,尤其是在母乳中,因为其对人类的风险尚不清楚,而以母乳为食的婴儿极易受到 EDCs 的影响。关于双酚 A(BPA)的生物监测,高效液相色谱/荧光检测(HPLC/FLD)在液相色谱/串联质谱(LC/MS/MS)之前得到了广泛应用。然而,在实际分析中,还没有同时评估这两种方法的报道。因此,我们使用 LC/MS/MS 和 HPLC/FLD 分析了人乳中的 BPA,并对两种方法在分析 BPA 水平方面进行了比较。在建立了最佳条件,如线性、回收率、重现性和游离 BPA 系统后,我们分析了 100 个人乳样本中的 BPA 水平。两种方法的检出限(LOQs)相似,分别为 HPLC/FLD 法和 LC/MS/MS 法的 1.8 和 1.3ng/mL。两种方法测定的总 BPA 水平之间存在很强的相关性(R²=0.40,p<0.01),但只有 11%的样本以 15%的变异系数(CV)分析为相似水平。此外,HPLC 法的 BPA 检测范围比 LC/MS/MS 法更宽。然而,HPLC/FLD 分析中的 BPA 水平低于 LC/MS/MS 分析(p<0.01)。因此,两种方法之间 BPA 水平的差异可能主要源于 LC/MS/MS 方法在低 BPA 样本中存在过度估计,以及 HPLC/FLD 方法在高 BPA 样本中存在部分分辨率较差的问题。