Suppr超能文献

比较不同抗栓治疗方案在接受药物洗脱支架植入术的房颤患者中的应用。

Comparison of different antithrombotic regimens for patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing drug-eluting stent implantation.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, An Zhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Circ J. 2010 Apr;74(4):701-8. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-09-0880. Epub 2010 Mar 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The optimal antithrombotic strategy for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation is unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The 622 consecutive AF patients undergoing DES implantation were prospectively enrolled. Among them, 142 patients (TT group) continued triple antithrombotic therapy comprising aspirin, clopidogrel and warfarin after discharge; 355 patients (DT group) had dual antiplatelet therapy; 125 patients (WS group) were discharged with warfarin and a single antiplatelet agent. Target INR was set as 1.8-2.5 and was regularly monitored after discharge. The TT group had a significant reduction in stroke and major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCE) (8.8% vs 20.1% vs 14.9%, P=0.010) as compared with either the DT or WS group. In the Cox regression analysis, administration with warfarin (hazard ratio (HR) 0.49; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31-0.77; P=0.002) and baseline CHADS(2) score >or=2 (HR 2.09; 95%CI 1.27-3.45; P=0.004) were independent predictors of MACCE. Importantly, the incidence of major bleeding was comparable among 3 groups (2.9% vs 1.8% vs 2.5%, P=0.725), although the overall bleeding rate was increased in the TT group. Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that the TT group was associated with the best net clinical outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

The cardiovascular benefits of triple antithrombotic therapy were confirmed by reducing the MACCE rate, and its major bleeding risk might be acceptable if the INR is closely monitored.

摘要

背景

接受药物洗脱支架(DES)植入的房颤(AF)患者的最佳抗栓策略尚不清楚。

方法和结果

前瞻性纳入 622 例连续 AF 患者行 DES 植入术。其中,142 例(TT 组)患者出院后继续三联抗栓治疗,包括阿司匹林、氯吡格雷和华法林;355 例(DT 组)患者接受双联抗血小板治疗;125 例(WS 组)出院时给予华法林和单一抗血小板药物。目标 INR 设定为 1.8-2.5,并在出院后定期监测。TT 组的卒中及主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE)发生率明显低于 DT 组(8.8%比 20.1%,P=0.010)和 WS 组(8.8%比 14.9%,P=0.010)。在 Cox 回归分析中,华法林的应用(风险比(HR)0.49;95%置信区间(CI)0.31-0.77;P=0.002)和基线 CHADS₂评分≥2 分(HR 2.09;95%CI 1.27-3.45;P=0.004)是 MACCE 的独立预测因素。重要的是,3 组间主要出血发生率相似(2.9%比 1.8%比 2.5%,P=0.725),尽管 TT 组的总出血发生率较高。Kaplan-Meier 分析表明,TT 组与最佳净临床结局相关。

结论

三联抗栓治疗通过降低 MACCE 发生率证实了其心血管获益,且如果 INR 密切监测,其大出血风险可能是可以接受的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验