• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

负压封闭引流在伴有或不伴有保留缝线的序贯筋膜闭合的严重腹腔感染中的应用:一项临床试验。

Vacuum-assisted closure in severe abdominal sepsis with or without retention sutured sequential fascial closure: a clinical trial.

机构信息

3rd Department of Surgery, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.

出版信息

Surgery. 2010 Nov;148(5):947-53. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.01.021. Epub 2010 Mar 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2010.01.021
PMID:20227097
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Multiple techniques have been introduced to obtain fascial closure for the open abdomen to minimize morbidity and cost of care. We hypothesized that a modification of the vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) technique that provides constant fascial tension and prevents abdominis rectis retraction would facilitate primary fascial closure and reduce morbidity.

METHODS

In all, 53 patients with severe abdominal sepsis were allocated randomly into 2 groups, and 30 patients were analyzed. In the VAC group, we included patients managed only with the VAC device, whereas the retentions sutured sequential fascial closure (RSSFC) group included patients to whom RSSFC was performed.

RESULTS

The abdomen was left open for 12 days (P = .0001) with 4.4 ± 1.35 changes per patient for the VAC group (P = .001) and 8 days with 2.87 ± 0.74 dressing changes per patient for the RSSFC group, respectively. Abdominal closure was possible in only 6 patients in the VAC group, whereas for the RSSFC group, abdominal closure was achieved in 14 patients (P = .005). Planned hernia was exclusively decided in patients in the VAC group (P = .001). The hospital stay was 17.53 ± 4.59 days for the VAC group and 11.93 ± 2.05 days for the RSSFC group (P = .0001). The median initial intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) was 12 mm Hg for the VAC group and 16 mm Hg for the RSSFC group (P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated the superiority of RSSFC compared with the single use of the VAC device. In our opinion, sequential fascial closure can immediately begin when abdominal sepsis is controlled.

摘要

背景

为了尽量减少开放性腹部的发病率和治疗费用,已经引入了多种技术来实现筋膜闭合。我们假设,对负压辅助闭合(VAC)技术进行改良,提供持续的筋膜张力并防止腹直肌收缩,可以促进原发性筋膜闭合并降低发病率。

方法

共有 53 例严重腹部感染的患者被随机分为 2 组,其中 30 例患者进行了分析。在 VAC 组中,我们仅包括接受 VAC 装置治疗的患者,而保留缝线序贯筋膜闭合(RSSFC)组则包括接受 RSSFC 治疗的患者。

结果

VAC 组的腹部敞开时间为 12 天(P =.0001),每位患者平均更换 4.4 ± 1.35 次敷料(P =.001),RSSFC 组的腹部敞开时间为 8 天,每位患者平均更换 2.87 ± 0.74 次敷料。VAC 组只有 6 例患者能够实现腹部闭合,而 RSSFC 组则有 14 例患者实现了腹部闭合(P =.005)。仅在 VAC 组的患者中决定了计划性疝。VAC 组的住院时间为 17.53 ± 4.59 天,RSSFC 组的住院时间为 11.93 ± 2.05 天(P =.0001)。VAC 组的初始腹腔内压(IAP)中位数为 12mmHg,RSSFC 组的初始 IAP 中位数为 16mmHg(P <.0001)。

结论

我们证明了 RSSFC 与单独使用 VAC 装置相比具有优越性。在我们看来,当腹部感染得到控制时,可以立即开始序贯筋膜闭合。

相似文献

1
Vacuum-assisted closure in severe abdominal sepsis with or without retention sutured sequential fascial closure: a clinical trial.负压封闭引流在伴有或不伴有保留缝线的序贯筋膜闭合的严重腹腔感染中的应用:一项临床试验。
Surgery. 2010 Nov;148(5):947-53. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.01.021. Epub 2010 Mar 15.
2
Prospective evaluation of vacuum-assisted closure in abdominal compartment syndrome and severe abdominal sepsis.腹腔间隔室综合征和严重腹部脓毒症中真空辅助闭合术的前瞻性评估
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Oct;205(4):586-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.05.015.
3
Commentary on "vacuum-assisted closure in severe abdominal sepsis with or without retention sutured sequential fascial closure: a clinical trial".关于“严重腹部脓毒症中使用或不使用保留缝线连续筋膜闭合的真空辅助闭合:一项临床试验”的评论
Surgery. 2010 Nov;148(5):954. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.03.027.
4
Commentary on "Vacuum-assisted closure in severe abdominal sepsis with or without retention sutured sequential fascial closure: a clinical trial".关于“真空辅助封闭技术用于伴有或不伴有保留缝线序贯筋膜缝合的严重腹部脓毒症:一项临床试验”的评论
Surgery. 2011 Mar;149(3):462-3. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.11.021.
5
A prospective, controlled evaluation of the abdominal reapproximation anchor abdominal wall closure system in combination with VAC therapy compared with VAC alone in the management of an open abdomen.一项前瞻性对照评估:在开放性腹部处理中,将腹壁再接近锚定腹壁闭合系统与VAC疗法联合使用与单独使用VAC疗法进行比较。
Am Surg. 2014 Jun;80(6):567-71.
6
Management of abdominal wound dehiscence using vacuum assisted closure in patients with compromised healing.使用负压封闭引流技术治疗愈合能力受损患者的腹部伤口裂开
Am J Surg. 2006 Feb;191(2):165-72. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.09.003.
7
Open abdomen treatment following endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.腹主动脉瘤破裂血管腔内修复术后的开放腹腔治疗
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Jul;50(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.12.030.
8
Vacuum and mesh-mediated fascial traction for primary closure of the open abdomen in critically ill surgical patients.重症外科患者开放性腹部初次缝合中应用真空和网片介导的筋膜牵引。
Br J Surg. 2012 Dec;99(12):1725-32. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8914. Epub 2012 Oct 3.
9
Long-term vacuum-assisted closure in open abdomen due to secondary peritonitis: a retrospective evaluation of a selected group of patients.长期负压封闭引流治疗继发性腹膜炎并发腹壁开放:一组选定患者的回顾性评估。
Dig Surg. 2010;27(4):272-8. doi: 10.1159/000314609. Epub 2010 Jul 22.
10
Intra-abdominal pressure development after different temporary abdominal closure techniques in a porcine model.猪模型中不同临时腹部关闭技术后的腹腔内压力变化
J Trauma. 2009 Apr;66(4):1118-24. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181820d94.

引用本文的文献

1
Vacuum-assisted closure or primary closure with relaparotomy on-demand in patients with secondary peritonitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.继发性腹膜炎患者采用真空辅助闭合术或按需再次剖腹手术进行一期闭合:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
World J Emerg Surg. 2025 May 22;20(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13017-025-00615-5.
2
Vacuum-Assisted Closure Significantly Reduces Surgical Postoperative Complications Compared With Primary Abdominal Closure in Patients With Secondary Peritonitis: A Comparative Retrospective Study.与一期腹部缝合相比,负压封闭引流显著降低继发性腹膜炎患者的外科术后并发症:一项比较性回顾性研究。
World J Surg. 2025 Feb;49(2):387-400. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12472. Epub 2025 Jan 10.
3
Early placement of a non-invasive, pressure-regulated, fascial reapproximation device improves reduction of the fascial gap in open abdomens: a retrospective cohort study.
早期放置非侵入性、压力调节的筋膜重新贴合装置可改善开放性腹部筋膜间隙的缩小:一项回顾性队列研究。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2024 Oct 12;9(1):e001529. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2024-001529. eCollection 2024.
4
Primary anastomosis and suturing combined with vacuum-assisted abdominal closure in patients with secondary peritonitis due to perforation of the small intestine: a retrospective study.原发性吻合与缝合联合负压辅助腹壁闭合在穿孔性小肠炎所致继发性腹膜炎患者中的应用:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Surg. 2023 Sep 15;23(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02179-0.
5
Retrospective Study of Indications and Outcomes of Open Abdomen with Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Technique for Abdominal Sepsis in a Tertiary Referral Centre.三级转诊中心负压伤口治疗技术开放性腹腔治疗腹部脓毒症的适应症及结局的回顾性研究
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Oct 28;11(11):1498. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11111498.
6
Vacuum-assisted closure versus on-demand relaparotomy in patients with secondary peritonitis-the VACOR trial: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.负压封闭引流与按需再次剖腹术治疗继发性腹膜炎的比较(VACOR 试验):一项随机对照试验的方案。
World J Emerg Surg. 2022 May 26;17(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13017-022-00427-x.
7
Negative pressure wound therapy for managing the open abdomen in non-trauma patients.负压伤口疗法在非创伤患者中用于管理开放性腹部。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 6;5(5):CD013710. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013710.pub2.
8
Simple and Efficient Pressure Ulcer Reconstruction via Primary Closure Combined with Closed-Incision Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (CiNPWT)-Experience of a Single Surgeon.通过一期缝合联合闭合切口负压伤口治疗(CiNPWT)进行简单高效的压疮重建——单中心经验
J Pers Med. 2022 Jan 29;12(2):182. doi: 10.3390/jpm12020182.
9
Delayed Closure of Open Abdomen in Septic Patients Treated With Negative Pressure Vacuum Therapy and Dynamic Sutures: A 10-Years Follow-Up on Long-Term Complications.负压真空疗法和动态缝合治疗脓毒症患者开放性腹部的延迟关闭:10年长期并发症随访
Front Surg. 2021 Jan 15;7:611905. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.611905. eCollection 2020.
10
The successful management for long-term intractable enteroatmospheric fistula: A case report.长期顽固性肠气瘘的成功管理:一例报告。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 Jul 30;57:253-256. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.07.044. eCollection 2020 Sep.