Department of Medical Imaging, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, 3175 Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Apr 20;35(9):989-94. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181bdcaa4.
Clinical trial comparing image quality and entrance dose between Biospace EOS system, a new slot-scanning radiographic device, and a Fuji FCR 7501S computed radiography (CR) system for 50 patients followed for spinal deformities.
Based on their physical properties, slot-scanners show the potential to produce image quality comparable to CR systems using less radiation. This article validates this assertion by comparing a new slot-scanner to a CR system through a wide-ranging evaluation of dose and image quality for scoliosis examinations.
For each patient included in this study, lateral and posteroanterior images were acquired with both systems. For each system, entrance dose was measured for different anatomic locations.
Dose and image quality being directly related, comparable images were obtained using the same radiograph tube voltage on both systems while tube currents were selected to match signal-to-noise ratios on a phantom. Different techniques were defined with respect to patient's thickness about the iliac crests. Given dose amplitudes expected for scoliosis examinations, optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters were chosen as optimal sensors. Two radiologists and 2 orthopedists evaluated the images in a randomized order using a questionnaire targeting anatomic landmarks. Visibility of the structures was rated on a 4 level scale. Image quality assessment was analyzed using a Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.
Average skin dose was reduced from 6 to 9 times in the thoracoabdominal region when using the slot-scanner instead of CR. Moreover, image quality was significantly better with EOS for all structures in the frontal view (P < 0.006) and lateral view (P < 0.04), except for lumbar spinous processes, better seen on the CR (P < 0.003).
We established that the EOS system offers overall enhanced image quality while reducing drastically the entrance dose for the patient.
对 50 例脊柱畸形患者进行临床试验,比较新型狭缝扫描放射设备 Biospace EOS 系统与富士 FCR 7501S 计算机放射(CR)系统的图像质量和入射剂量。
根据其物理特性,狭缝扫描仪具有使用较少辐射产生与 CR 系统相当的图像质量的潜力。本文通过对脊柱侧凸检查的剂量和图像质量进行广泛评估,验证了这一说法,即将新型狭缝扫描仪与 CR 系统进行比较。
对于本研究中纳入的每位患者,均使用两种系统采集侧位和前后位图像。对于每种系统,均测量不同解剖部位的入射剂量。
剂量和图像质量直接相关,因此在两种系统上使用相同的射线管电压获得可比图像,同时选择射线管电流以匹配体模上的信噪比。根据患者髂嵴处的厚度,定义了不同的技术。考虑到脊柱侧凸检查的预期剂量幅度,选择光激励发光剂量计作为最佳传感器。两位放射科医生和两位骨科医生使用针对解剖学标志的问卷,以随机顺序评估图像。使用 4 级量表评估结构的可见度。使用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验分析图像质量评估。
与 CR 相比,使用狭缝扫描仪时,胸腹部的平均皮肤剂量降低了 6 至 9 倍。此外,EOS 在正面视图(P <0.006)和侧面视图(P <0.04)中对所有结构的图像质量均显著优于 CR,除了腰椎棘突,CR 上的图像质量更好(P <0.003)。
我们证实 EOS 系统在大幅降低患者入射剂量的同时,提供了整体增强的图像质量。