Suppr超能文献

阿达木单抗、依那西普和英夫利昔单抗治疗类风湿关节炎的疗效和安全性的荟萃分析。

Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

机构信息

Pharmacy Practice Research Group, Pharmacy Department, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.

出版信息

Pharmacotherapy. 2010 Apr;30(4):339-53. doi: 10.1592/phco.30.4.339.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of using the anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNF-alpha) drugs adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis of 21 randomized, placebo-controlled trials (eight adalimumab, seven infliximab, six etanercept).

PATIENTS

Adults with rheumatoid arthritis who received adalimumab (1524 patients), infliximab (1116 patients), etanercept (1029 patients), or placebo (2834 patients) with or without concomitant methotrexate in all groups.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A literature search of several databases from January 1995-December 2008 was performed. There were no restrictions based on language or date of publication, and low-quality studies (based on Jadad score) were excluded. American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% improvement criteria (ACR20), 50% improvement criteria (ACR50), and 70% improvement criteria (ACR70) were used to compare treatment efficacy. Safety was compared based on frequency of serious adverse events, serious infections, malignancy, and death. Withdrawals due to adverse events and lack of efficacy were also evaluated. With short-term treatment (12-30 wks), etanercept demonstrated the highest risk ratios (RRs) for reaching ACR20 and ACR50: 2.94 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.27-3.81) and 5.28 (95% CI 3.12-8.92), respectively. Adalimumab demonstrated the highest RR for achieving ACR70 (5.36, 95% CI 3.76- 7.64). Over a long-term treatment course (1-3 yrs), adalimumab demonstrated the highest RRs (95% CIs) for these parameters: 1.85 (1.07-3.19), 2.80 (1.16-6.77), and 3.23 (1.37-7.61) for ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70, respectively. No statistically significant differences were noted in the safety of any of the three drugs compared with placebo. Infliximab had the highest RRs for withdrawing from the study due to lack of efficacy (2.05, 95% CI 1.33-3.16) and adverse events (0.41, 95% CI 0.18-0.95).

CONCLUSION

With short-term treatment, etanercept and adalimumab had higher efficacy results; with long-term treatment, adalimumab appeared to be the most effective. Clinicians should be aware that each of the three drugs has different rates of efficacy and different safety considerations that must be taken into account when selecting the best treatment for an individual with rheumatoid arthritis.

摘要

研究目的

评估使用抗肿瘤坏死因子-α(抗 TNF-α)药物阿达木单抗、依那西普和英夫利昔单抗治疗类风湿关节炎的疗效和安全性。

设计

21 项随机、安慰剂对照试验(阿达木单抗 8 项、英夫利昔单抗 7 项、依那西普 6 项)的系统评价和荟萃分析。

患者

接受阿达木单抗(1524 例患者)、英夫利昔单抗(1116 例患者)、依那西普(1029 例患者)或安慰剂(2834 例患者)治疗的类风湿关节炎成人患者,所有患者均接受或未接受甲氨蝶呤联合治疗。

测量和主要结果

对 1995 年 1 月至 2008 年 12 月期间多个数据库进行文献检索。未基于语言或发表日期设置任何限制,排除低质量研究(基于 Jadad 评分)。采用美国风湿病学会(ACR)20%改善标准(ACR20)、50%改善标准(ACR50)和 70%改善标准(ACR70)比较治疗效果。根据严重不良事件、严重感染、恶性肿瘤和死亡的发生频率比较安全性。还评估了因不良事件和疗效不佳而导致的停药。短期治疗(12-30 周)时,依那西普在达到 ACR20 和 ACR50 方面的风险比(RR)最高:2.94(95%置信区间 [CI] 2.27-3.81)和 5.28(95% CI 3.12-8.92)。阿达木单抗在达到 ACR70 方面的 RR 最高(5.36,95% CI 3.76-7.64)。长期治疗(1-3 年)时,阿达木单抗在这些参数方面的 RR(95% CI)最高:1.85(1.07-3.19)、2.80(1.16-6.77)和 3.23(1.37-7.61),分别为 ACR20、ACR50 和 ACR70。与安慰剂相比,三种药物在安全性方面无统计学差异。与安慰剂相比,英夫利昔单抗因疗效不佳(2.05,95% CI 1.33-3.16)和不良事件(0.41,95% CI 0.18-0.95)而退出研究的 RR 最高。

结论

短期治疗时,依那西普和阿达木单抗疗效较高;长期治疗时,阿达木单抗似乎最有效。临床医生应注意,三种药物的疗效和安全性各有不同,在为类风湿关节炎患者选择最佳治疗方案时必须考虑这些因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验