Suppr超能文献

多中心评估 LightCycler 耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)高级检测试验作为一种快速检测鼻拭子中 MRSA 的方法。

Multicenter evaluation of the LightCycler methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) advanced test as a rapid method for detection of MRSA in nasal surveillance swabs.

机构信息

NorthShore University HealthSystem, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 2650 Ridge Avenue, Walgreen Bldg., SB525, Evanston, IL 60201, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2010 May;48(5):1661-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00003-10. Epub 2010 Mar 24.

Abstract

The rate of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection continues to rise in many health care settings. Rapid detection of MRSA colonization followed by appropriate isolation can reduce transmission and infection. We compared the performance of the new Roche LightCycler MRSA advanced test to that of the BD GeneOhm MRSA test and culture. Double-headed swabs were used to collect anterior nasal specimens from each subject. For both tests, DNA was extracted and real-time PCR was performed according to manufacturer's instructions. For culture, one swab of the pair was plated directly to CHROMagar MRSA. The swab paired with the BD GeneOhm MRSA test was also placed into an enrichment broth and then plated to CHROMagar MRSA. Colonies resembling staphylococci were confirmed as S. aureus by standard methods. Discrepant specimens had further testing with additional attempts to grow MRSA as well as sample amplicon sequencing. Agreement between results for the two swabs was 99.3% for those with valid results. A total of 1,402 specimens were tested using direct culture detection of MRSA as the gold standard; 187 were culture positive for MRSA. The LightCycler MRSA advanced test had relative sensitivity and specificity of 95.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 91.1% to 97.8%) and 96.4% (95% CI: 95.2% to 97.4%), respectively. The BD GeneOhm assay had relative sensitivity and specificity of 95.7% (95% CI: 91.7% to 98.1%) and 91.7% (95% CI: 90.0% to 93.2%), respectively. Following discrepancy analysis, the relative sensitivities of the LightCycler MRSA advanced test and the BD GeneOhm MRSA assay were 92.2 and 93.2%, respectively; relative specificities were 98.9 and 94.2%, respectively. Specificity was significantly better (P<0.001) with the LightCycler MRSA advanced test. The sensitivity of direct culture was 80.4%. The LightCycler MRSA advanced test is a useful tool for sensitive and rapid detection of MRSA nasal colonization.

摘要

耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)感染率在许多医疗环境中持续上升。快速检测 MRSA 定植并进行适当的隔离可以减少传播和感染。我们比较了罗氏 LightCycler MRSA 高级检测与 BD GeneOhm MRSA 检测和培养的性能。双头拭子用于从每个受试者收集前鼻标本。对于两种检测方法,均按照制造商的说明提取 DNA 并进行实时 PCR。对于培养,一对拭子中的一个直接接种到 CHROMagar MRSA 平板上。与 BD GeneOhm MRSA 检测配套的拭子也被放入富集肉汤中,然后接种到 CHROMagar MRSA 平板上。类似于葡萄球菌的菌落通过标准方法确认为金黄色葡萄球菌。对有差异的标本进行进一步的检测,包括尝试进一步培养 MRSA 以及样本扩增子测序。对于有有效结果的两种拭子,结果的一致性为 99.3%。使用直接培养检测 MRSA 作为金标准共检测了 1402 份标本;其中 187 份标本培养出 MRSA 阳性。LightCycler MRSA 高级检测的相对灵敏度和特异性分别为 95.2%(95%置信区间[CI]:91.1%至 97.8%)和 96.4%(95% CI:95.2%至 97.4%)。BD GeneOhm 检测的相对灵敏度和特异性分别为 95.7%(95% CI:91.7%至 98.1%)和 91.7%(95% CI:90.0%至 93.2%)。在差异分析后,LightCycler MRSA 高级检测和 BD GeneOhm MRSA 检测的相对灵敏度分别为 92.2%和 93.2%;相对特异性分别为 98.9%和 94.2%。LightCycler MRSA 高级检测的特异性显著更好(P<0.001)。直接培养的灵敏度为 80.4%。LightCycler MRSA 高级检测是一种用于敏感、快速检测 MRSA 鼻腔定植的有用工具。

相似文献

10
Evaluation of multiple real-time PCR tests on nasal samples in a large MRSA surveillance program.
Am J Clin Pathol. 2015 May;143(5):652-8. doi: 10.1309/AJCPMDY32ZTDXPFC.

引用本文的文献

1
Culture harder: use more specimens to increase methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus culture yield relative to PCR.
Access Microbiol. 2025 Jun 3;7(6). doi: 10.1099/acmi.0.000918.v4. eCollection 2025.
2
Laboratory tools for the direct detection of bacterial respiratory infections and antimicrobial resistance: a scoping review.
J Vet Diagn Invest. 2024 May;36(3):400-417. doi: 10.1177/10406387241235968. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
3
Rapid One-Tube RPA-CRISPR/Cas12 Detection Platform for Methicillin-Resistant .
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Mar 28;12(4):829. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12040829.
4
Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Infections Using Molecular Methods.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Feb 12;11(2):239. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11020239.
5
Biographical Feature: Andrew B. Onderdonk, Ph.D.
J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Oct 19;59(11):e0150521. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01505-21. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
6
Methicillin-Resistant Nasal Colonization Among Health Care Workers of a Tertiary Hospital in Ecuador and Associated Risk Factors.
Infect Drug Resist. 2021 Aug 25;14:3433-3440. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S326148. eCollection 2021.
8
Methicillin-resistant screening is important for surgeons.
Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2019 Aug;23(3):265-273. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.2019.23.3.265. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
9
COMPARISON OF METHODS TO IDENTIFY Neisseria meningitidis IN ASYMPTOMATIC CARRIERS.
Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2016 Sep 22;58:60. doi: 10.1590/S1678-9946201658060.
10
PCR-based Approaches for the Detection of Clinical Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
Open Microbiol J. 2016 Apr 14;10:45-56. doi: 10.2174/1874285801610010045. eCollection 2016.

本文引用的文献

1
To screen or not to screen for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Mar;48(3):683-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02516-09. Epub 2010 Jan 13.
6
Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management strategies.
Clin Infect Dis. 2009 May 15;48 Suppl 4:S231-7. doi: 10.1086/598189.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验